New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
22
posted 1 year ago by TexasVet on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +22Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
10 comments:
deleted 1 year ago 20 points (+0 / -0 / +20Score on mirror )
Delon on scored.co
1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 3 children
you know sometimes i wonder if ,with how brainwashed we have been as a whole with the ideology of individualism, we might be able to ever achieve such levels of ethnic cooperation. Especially with how mutted we are becoming. Not trying to blackpill here but the more i look around the more "no one's coming to save you" as in calling for cooperation in a loose, unorganized way, seems like a fool's errand. I don't think we can work this out without a leader, a Fuhrer, if you will
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
I think we *will* see some form of a collapse, either partial or complete, and that will be what forces us to become collective again. Hyper-individualism is a symptom of a diseased and dying society.
Mellop on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
A society of consumers doesn't need much cooperation.

Thankfully, the judeo-american way of life is fading, and it's not coming back.
An economy of consumers, and non-productive business, such as banking or facebook, is not sustainable.
In matters of actual, productive labor, Amerimutts have long yielded the field to other nations. Hence the ever-growing trade deficit.

Another effect of the parasitic system is national debt. The debt your so-called representatives accrued in your name, and that you can never default on, not even in death. Your children will inherit that debt.

All this tells me the system has no future.
You can't screw all the goyim all the time. At some point, the bill comes due.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The smallest group of people that individualism can be applied to and work is at the family/household level IMHO. I also believe the largest level at which the average person considers socialism/communism can work is at the family/household level. With that’s said, even then, both will eventually have problems and break down at some juncture if not meticulously maintained, and controlled.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
Good vid, but he forgot the most important part. None of it will, or can ever even have a chance of working in a motley crew of diverse melting 💩. This is a very very important distinction, and most be emphasized.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Eh... communism is a jewish occupation seeking to destroy economy, culture and the nation of the affected country. NatSoc is a system that combines free market with the concept of doing good to the country.

What practices are there that actively harm the lives of people, is exploitative, damage the economy? Having Bill Gates buy up large quantities of land, having some smug kike drive up the price of a medication by a large factor, having politics be heavily influenced by foreigners and money.

Oh, and the #1 is the central banking system that is in the hands of jews, that is the source of all evil they commit.
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Communism: jews have all of the institutional power.

Nazism: jews have NONE of the institutional power.

Simple as.
Flarisu on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Hitler explained this well in that book he wrote.
He refers to communism as *russian* communism, or Bolshevism.
He adopts the idea of using a command economy, but does not use the state to own all property. Instead, his economy is still dictated via the union and the union threatens business owners to compliance. Business owners he didn't approve of (mostly the jewish ones) did indeed have their property seized and distributed to others.

Notably, this method is, like most socialisms, not good at generating wealth. Hitler ran out of wealth to plunder after he had seized most of the jewish property and when threatened with a loss of capital, adopted a plan to invade Poland with Russia so that he could maintain the German status quo. We all know how that ended up in the end.

Russian Communists, when allied with the Allied forces, took credit for having defeated the National Socialists (despite sending in pitchfork-wielding soldiers and suffering the greatest losses in the war) and used this victory to claim that somehow Russian Socialism was superior. (Bolshevism literally inspired National Socialism because of how destructive it was to its own economy in 1917 when Lenin started it.)
DavidColeIntrepid on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
This is entirely bullshit
Toast message