One of the things I don't think people are talking about enough is how the paradigm in politics have shifted.
It used to be "R" vs. "D". Both on the R and D sides, however, there were people who didn't agree with either R or D and wanted to capture control of their respective parties to get their things done.
Now that we are no longer R or D, or that the distinction doesn't really matter, we have an opportunity to redefine the paradigm in politics. Keep in mind that it's fundamental that things are framed as X vs. not-X. We can't change that. Choose your "X" carefully and just by the very definition of the division, you can win the fight before it starts.
Here are a few possible divisions we can emphasize, to our advantage.
1. American vs. Non-American. This paradigm would be those who understand and celebrate what it means to be American vs. those who do not. The obvious implication is that America should be for Americans and everyone else should leave and go somewhere else. What's critical here is that we are able to clearly identify what is "American" and make sure it is broad enough to include a clear majority of Americans but not so broad that it includes those who would destroy us.
2. Tradition vs. Rebellion. This one is more geared for culture but politics is downstream of culture. The "tradition" side wants to bring back the nuclear family, property ownership, men's rights, etc... while the rebellion side wants to overthrow all that and establish "something else" as the ideal. This argument, I think, is pretty easy to win, especially if you don't fall into the trap of allowing the "rebellion" to present your side as tyrannical. IE, "we don't want to kill all the gays (not yet at least), we just want to raise our families outside of their influence." I don't think it's quite time where we can openly say or do things like "kill all the degenerates" but I think we are getting close, so it's important that we continue to gather our side together with a common cause.
3. Modern Science vs. Voodoo. For too long we have allowed jews and atheists to co-opt the word "science" and present their voodoo magic as "science" and poo-poo hard science as radical Christianity. This is a bigger discussion but when you dive into what makes modern science so special and unique and powerful, you see that at its heart it is Christian fundamentalism. Descartes, for instance, started with the idea "I think therefore I am" but the very next idea was "therefore the Christian God exists, and can teach me true knowledge." This one will be much more difficult to capture, but I think it is very doable especially if Christians stop running from real science or hiding who they are and what they believe.
4. Health vs. goyslop & the industrial medical complex. I don't have to say much more on this. I think RFK Jr is going to do something big, I don't know what, but I can't imagine that we would benefit if we let "goyslop" carry the day. When you start buying "health" food from local farmers and make it a priority to grow and cook your own food -- you're taking a side in this new paradigm. Start telling your friends and family and start advertising this new lifestyle.
5. True Christianity vs. Fake Mainstream "Christianity". I can't emphasize how important it is that we "win" the battle against blue-haired liberals running our churches. Do NOT cede them any ground. Think CAREFULLY about what your preacher, pastor or priest is saying and if they are teaching communist ideas as "Christianity" you need to get your friends together and kick them out, HARD. At some point, all of the "conservative" Christian churches are going to have to band together to drive the "liberals" out of the country and reclaim our heritage.
Take part in these new paradigm shifts. The old ways are gone. Let's start the new ways.
It used to be "R" vs. "D". Both on the R and D sides, however, there were people who didn't agree with either R or D and wanted to capture control of their respective parties to get their things done.
Now that we are no longer R or D, or that the distinction doesn't really matter, we have an opportunity to redefine the paradigm in politics. Keep in mind that it's fundamental that things are framed as X vs. not-X. We can't change that. Choose your "X" carefully and just by the very definition of the division, you can win the fight before it starts.
Here are a few possible divisions we can emphasize, to our advantage.
1. American vs. Non-American. This paradigm would be those who understand and celebrate what it means to be American vs. those who do not. The obvious implication is that America should be for Americans and everyone else should leave and go somewhere else. What's critical here is that we are able to clearly identify what is "American" and make sure it is broad enough to include a clear majority of Americans but not so broad that it includes those who would destroy us.
2. Tradition vs. Rebellion. This one is more geared for culture but politics is downstream of culture. The "tradition" side wants to bring back the nuclear family, property ownership, men's rights, etc... while the rebellion side wants to overthrow all that and establish "something else" as the ideal. This argument, I think, is pretty easy to win, especially if you don't fall into the trap of allowing the "rebellion" to present your side as tyrannical. IE, "we don't want to kill all the gays (not yet at least), we just want to raise our families outside of their influence." I don't think it's quite time where we can openly say or do things like "kill all the degenerates" but I think we are getting close, so it's important that we continue to gather our side together with a common cause.
3. Modern Science vs. Voodoo. For too long we have allowed jews and atheists to co-opt the word "science" and present their voodoo magic as "science" and poo-poo hard science as radical Christianity. This is a bigger discussion but when you dive into what makes modern science so special and unique and powerful, you see that at its heart it is Christian fundamentalism. Descartes, for instance, started with the idea "I think therefore I am" but the very next idea was "therefore the Christian God exists, and can teach me true knowledge." This one will be much more difficult to capture, but I think it is very doable especially if Christians stop running from real science or hiding who they are and what they believe.
4. Health vs. goyslop & the industrial medical complex. I don't have to say much more on this. I think RFK Jr is going to do something big, I don't know what, but I can't imagine that we would benefit if we let "goyslop" carry the day. When you start buying "health" food from local farmers and make it a priority to grow and cook your own food -- you're taking a side in this new paradigm. Start telling your friends and family and start advertising this new lifestyle.
5. True Christianity vs. Fake Mainstream "Christianity". I can't emphasize how important it is that we "win" the battle against blue-haired liberals running our churches. Do NOT cede them any ground. Think CAREFULLY about what your preacher, pastor or priest is saying and if they are teaching communist ideas as "Christianity" you need to get your friends together and kick them out, HARD. At some point, all of the "conservative" Christian churches are going to have to band together to drive the "liberals" out of the country and reclaim our heritage.
Take part in these new paradigm shifts. The old ways are gone. Let's start the new ways.