One of the things I don't think people are talking about enough is how the paradigm in politics have shifted.
It used to be "R" vs. "D". Both on the R and D sides, however, there were people who didn't agree with either R or D and wanted to capture control of their respective parties to get their things done.
Now that we are no longer R or D, or that the distinction doesn't really matter, we have an opportunity to redefine the paradigm in politics. Keep in mind that it's fundamental that things are framed as X vs. not-X. We can't change that. Choose your "X" carefully and just by the very definition of the division, you can win the fight before it starts.
Here are a few possible divisions we can emphasize, to our advantage.
1. American vs. Non-American. This paradigm would be those who understand and celebrate what it means to be American vs. those who do not. The obvious implication is that America should be for Americans and everyone else should leave and go somewhere else. What's critical here is that we are able to clearly identify what is "American" and make sure it is broad enough to include a clear majority of Americans but not so broad that it includes those who would destroy us.
2. Tradition vs. Rebellion. This one is more geared for culture but politics is downstream of culture. The "tradition" side wants to bring back the nuclear family, property ownership, men's rights, etc... while the rebellion side wants to overthrow all that and establish "something else" as the ideal. This argument, I think, is pretty easy to win, especially if you don't fall into the trap of allowing the "rebellion" to present your side as tyrannical. IE, "we don't want to kill all the gays (not yet at least), we just want to raise our families outside of their influence." I don't think it's quite time where we can openly say or do things like "kill all the degenerates" but I think we are getting close, so it's important that we continue to gather our side together with a common cause.
3. Modern Science vs. Voodoo. For too long we have allowed jews and atheists to co-opt the word "science" and present their voodoo magic as "science" and poo-poo hard science as radical Christianity. This is a bigger discussion but when you dive into what makes modern science so special and unique and powerful, you see that at its heart it is Christian fundamentalism. Descartes, for instance, started with the idea "I think therefore I am" but the very next idea was "therefore the Christian God exists, and can teach me true knowledge." This one will be much more difficult to capture, but I think it is very doable especially if Christians stop running from real science or hiding who they are and what they believe.
4. Health vs. goyslop & the industrial medical complex. I don't have to say much more on this. I think RFK Jr is going to do something big, I don't know what, but I can't imagine that we would benefit if we let "goyslop" carry the day. When you start buying "health" food from local farmers and make it a priority to grow and cook your own food -- you're taking a side in this new paradigm. Start telling your friends and family and start advertising this new lifestyle.
5. True Christianity vs. Fake Mainstream "Christianity". I can't emphasize how important it is that we "win" the battle against blue-haired liberals running our churches. Do NOT cede them any ground. Think CAREFULLY about what your preacher, pastor or priest is saying and if they are teaching communist ideas as "Christianity" you need to get your friends together and kick them out, HARD. At some point, all of the "conservative" Christian churches are going to have to band together to drive the "liberals" out of the country and reclaim our heritage.
Take part in these new paradigm shifts. The old ways are gone. Let's start the new ways.
It used to be "R" vs. "D". Both on the R and D sides, however, there were people who didn't agree with either R or D and wanted to capture control of their respective parties to get their things done.
Now that we are no longer R or D, or that the distinction doesn't really matter, we have an opportunity to redefine the paradigm in politics. Keep in mind that it's fundamental that things are framed as X vs. not-X. We can't change that. Choose your "X" carefully and just by the very definition of the division, you can win the fight before it starts.
Here are a few possible divisions we can emphasize, to our advantage.
1. American vs. Non-American. This paradigm would be those who understand and celebrate what it means to be American vs. those who do not. The obvious implication is that America should be for Americans and everyone else should leave and go somewhere else. What's critical here is that we are able to clearly identify what is "American" and make sure it is broad enough to include a clear majority of Americans but not so broad that it includes those who would destroy us.
2. Tradition vs. Rebellion. This one is more geared for culture but politics is downstream of culture. The "tradition" side wants to bring back the nuclear family, property ownership, men's rights, etc... while the rebellion side wants to overthrow all that and establish "something else" as the ideal. This argument, I think, is pretty easy to win, especially if you don't fall into the trap of allowing the "rebellion" to present your side as tyrannical. IE, "we don't want to kill all the gays (not yet at least), we just want to raise our families outside of their influence." I don't think it's quite time where we can openly say or do things like "kill all the degenerates" but I think we are getting close, so it's important that we continue to gather our side together with a common cause.
3. Modern Science vs. Voodoo. For too long we have allowed jews and atheists to co-opt the word "science" and present their voodoo magic as "science" and poo-poo hard science as radical Christianity. This is a bigger discussion but when you dive into what makes modern science so special and unique and powerful, you see that at its heart it is Christian fundamentalism. Descartes, for instance, started with the idea "I think therefore I am" but the very next idea was "therefore the Christian God exists, and can teach me true knowledge." This one will be much more difficult to capture, but I think it is very doable especially if Christians stop running from real science or hiding who they are and what they believe.
4. Health vs. goyslop & the industrial medical complex. I don't have to say much more on this. I think RFK Jr is going to do something big, I don't know what, but I can't imagine that we would benefit if we let "goyslop" carry the day. When you start buying "health" food from local farmers and make it a priority to grow and cook your own food -- you're taking a side in this new paradigm. Start telling your friends and family and start advertising this new lifestyle.
5. True Christianity vs. Fake Mainstream "Christianity". I can't emphasize how important it is that we "win" the battle against blue-haired liberals running our churches. Do NOT cede them any ground. Think CAREFULLY about what your preacher, pastor or priest is saying and if they are teaching communist ideas as "Christianity" you need to get your friends together and kick them out, HARD. At some point, all of the "conservative" Christian churches are going to have to band together to drive the "liberals" out of the country and reclaim our heritage.
Take part in these new paradigm shifts. The old ways are gone. Let's start the new ways.
You are right that politics can influence culture, but the way I see it is something like this:
* Religion defines what is real and what is not, what is good and what is not.
* Culture takes what religion gives it and produces what people actually do and don't do.
* Politics is a formalization of culture and writes things into laws like "drive on the right side of the road" and "if someone murders this is how we deal with it."
Politics has to exist within the framework of culture, and only has a little bit of influence on it. However, culture has way more influence on politics. Good example: peanut the squirrel is culture. The fact that we accept someone raising a squirrel he captured (saved?) in his home and we expect that such a thing should be celebrated. But this is dependent on religion, which says we should be nice to critters and we shouldn't hurt things weaker than us.
REAL power would be to be able to dictate to the people what is real and what is not, and what is good and what is not. Next to that is the power to change how people do things and think about things. And the lowest power is the power to tell people what to do and how to do it. Remember, people can just refuse to do things they don't want to do.
You think all the Mormons stopped preaching nigger inferiority because they wanted to? No, the government threatened to revoke their charity license over racial discrimination. They changed their culture because of law.
These effects are even more obvious in regulated industries.
2. We changed our PRACTICE because God told us to. We never changed our DOCTRINE ever.