New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
posted 1 year ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Table Talks is legitimate, David Irving himself confirmed it (same as the Goebbels Diary)
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Not really. It was translated into french by a jew. Then to english, by a jew. The original German is extremely different.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
https://www.fpp.co.uk/Letters/Hitler/TableTalk010104.html Irving on the translation
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
No it's not, actually. Irving is not always the greatest resource on things; he isn't perfect. There was a great thread on Frenschan about the TT before it got shoah'd, I managed to find some bits of it that I had saved

https://files.catbox.moe/gnx26d.png

https://files.catbox.moe/cs3v57.png

https://files.catbox.moe/fx9zwq.png

We can deduce its illegitimacy quite simply though. The original documents that the TT was composed from spent time in (((allied))) hands after the war, so there you have it. If that wasn't enough, the table talks are the *only* source in existence for anti-Christian quotes attributed to Hitler. No other book, publication, or speech that he *ever* produced or originated contained similar sentiments. Gee, I wonder why that might be. You are correct about the Goebbels diary though.
Toast message