Hitlers Zweites Buch, Ein Dokument Aus Dem Jahr.
(twitter.com)
Yes thank you, table talk is straight up JEWISH.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
14 comments:
Table Talk's chain of custody is all jew up and down. One jew selling a secret collectible to another then onto gullible goys.
I have a digital copy already up in case you want it
https://communities.win/c/NationalSocialism/p/199hlGflUS/hitlers-second-book-german-forei/c
https://communities.win/c/NationalSocialism/p/199hlGflUS/hitlers-second-book-german-forei/c
u/SFAM1A
u/GoldenInnosStatue
You guys ever heard or read this biok?
u/GoldenInnosStatue
You guys ever heard or read this biok?
The book commonly known as "Hitler's second book" was published by a jew. Need I say more? I have never seen this particular picture before, but my guess is that it's just the German version of what I've already seen.
OP is correct about the Table Talks being fake though, so he doesn't immediately strike me as a disingenuous shill.
OP is correct about the Table Talks being fake though, so he doesn't immediately strike me as a disingenuous shill.
Table Talks is legitimate, David Irving himself confirmed it (same as the Goebbels Diary)
Not really. It was translated into french by a jew. Then to english, by a jew. The original German is extremely different.
No it's not, actually. Irving is not always the greatest resource on things; he isn't perfect. There was a great thread on Frenschan about the TT before it got shoah'd, I managed to find some bits of it that I had saved
https://files.catbox.moe/gnx26d.png
https://files.catbox.moe/cs3v57.png
https://files.catbox.moe/fx9zwq.png
We can deduce its illegitimacy quite simply though. The original documents that the TT was composed from spent time in (((allied))) hands after the war, so there you have it. If that wasn't enough, the table talks are the *only* source in existence for anti-Christian quotes attributed to Hitler. No other book, publication, or speech that he *ever* produced or originated contained similar sentiments. Gee, I wonder why that might be. You are correct about the Goebbels diary though.
https://files.catbox.moe/gnx26d.png
https://files.catbox.moe/cs3v57.png
https://files.catbox.moe/fx9zwq.png
We can deduce its illegitimacy quite simply though. The original documents that the TT was composed from spent time in (((allied))) hands after the war, so there you have it. If that wasn't enough, the table talks are the *only* source in existence for anti-Christian quotes attributed to Hitler. No other book, publication, or speech that he *ever* produced or originated contained similar sentiments. Gee, I wonder why that might be. You are correct about the Goebbels diary though.
Well after doing some digging the book was of the recorded transcripts that never really saw the day until it was published in 1961. Then another version was published one more time in 2003 by the jew Gerhard Weinberg. So if you can get the original transcripts or perhaps the 1961 book should be legit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitlers_Zweites_Buch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitlers_Zweites_Buch
Toast message
What did you think of Hitler's 2nd book? The general consensus is that the book is legit, it detailed much of Hitler's desired foreign policy, which he decided to not show his hand later on. What subjects does the book actually go over.
**In His Own Words: the Essential Speeches of Adolf Hitler** is a pretty good book. I'd recommend that over the "Table talks".