New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
102
Oh no. anyway. (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by EJGeneric on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +102Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
18 comments:
18
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 18 points (+0 / -0 / +18Score on mirror ) 3 children
It reminds me back in the 90s someone said you could buy guns at gun shows with no background check. So they drove over to a gun show and tried to buy guns. When they asked to do a background check, the person said "I was told I don't need one by the democrats."

It didn't go well.

Also, about 5 or so years ago, a liberal journalist tried to go out of state to buy a gun. He was told no. So he went local to buy a gun. The background check was not clean, and I think he ended up committing a felony because he lied on the form or something.

I'm of the opinion that democrats should not be allowed to own or carry guns. I think our current system of checking to see if a person is not a criminal or insane gets us that net effect.
NiggerWithAForklift on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 4 children
Gonna be an unpopular opinion here, but guns are inherently evil. They shouldn't exist and certainly not in the hands of citizens. Why do we need killing machines capable of murdering multiple people at once? This is why I believe democrats should own neither guns nor cars - let them keep their peace and their truth. As a matter of fact, they should donate all twenty guns that they collectively own to conservatives. Let us deal with the burden of this awful technology.
asdfik on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
stfu eurocuck faggot
Maskurbator on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
Someone didn't catch the sarcasm.
asdfik on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
someone's gay (it is you)
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
You have a completely wrong understanding.

Government IS the citizens.

Any government that doesn't derive their powers from the people they govern is a tyranny and should not exist.

The **government** should not have guns. If they need someone to fight, they should ask the citizens to do so on their behalf. If the citizens say "no" then the government can't fight a war at all.
Inbredsandwich1 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
"God created men, Colt made them equal."

Guns are the equalizers of our age. Whereas any other age the general populace were at the mercy of their overlords, who possessed the weaponry to be capable of undeterred tyranny, modern guns in the hand of the populace prevent such situations, looking no further than the American Revolution. Of course, like any other thing in the world, guns can be abused when in the wrong hands, but that doesn't mean the general populace shouldn't have them. Almost every incident that involved a crazy person with a gun could have been immediately stopped if every other sane person was armed (like that guy that stopped the Indiana mall shooter back in 2022). Although I understand your reasoning, I have to disagree on guns being inherently evil. If that's the case, the argument could be made for every other form of weaponry being evil as such things are also capable of killing multiple people at once. We have to remember that the foundational reason for having weaponry like guns is for defense.
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Maskurbator on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
Here's the thing: leftists are 99% projection. So when they say "you shouldn't be allowed to have an AR-15 because you might use it to kill tons of people" they are basically admitting that's what they want and/or will do.

They are afraid that everyone else is as horrible as they are.
brimshae on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
>Here's the thing: leftists are 99% projection. So when they say "you shouldn't be allowed to have an AR-15 because you might use it to kill tons of people" they are basically admitting that's what they want and/or will do.

You can also gauge how they feel by asking them not how they're doing financially, but how their neighbors are doing.
Deadlaw on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Thank you, it's important to point out brain shortcuts to leftist mind-break locations.
Lurkerlurker on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Yeah people are fucking retarded when it comes to this shit.

They are being told, not even half truths like the jews usually do. They are being told blatant lies that can easily be confirmed by doing this.

Background checks are basically just keeping niggers from going into a store and buying a gun, which is pretty based. If they have a gun, there is great reason they did not get it through the republican/democrat approved system.

So great point. Next time someone says this shit, take them to the store, have them buy even a .22 and tell them they don’t want to do a background check.
13
derjudenjager on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror )
Lmao
brimshae on scored.co
1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 1 child
Remember, when a commie fuckwit asks you what ammo is best to buy for his AR15, that .300 Blackout is the best choice.
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
I remember a story from an Australian gun shop, back when Australian gun shops were a thing.

This guy walked into the shop and asked the clerk why his gun was not firing.

The clerk replied, in a deadpan voice:

"Because those are the wrong bullets, in the wrong magazine, in the wrong gun."

deleted 1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 2 children
ScandinavianWhite on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
They wouldn't even use that, they'd know their place.
windsofthepast on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Would add more criteria than just white. White men. Certain income level. Landowner. This way would weed out all the nigger loving soy cucks and deadbeats.
Toast message