New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I get it, there's a based niggerino here and a based spicerino there but if they actually filtered out people based off of their so-called "American ideals", this country would be 99% White.

The civic nationalism route is for chicken shits who are too afraid to be called mean words by people that hate them because of their ethnicity and it doesn't matter how much they cower, they will still be hated because at the end of the day, they are Europeans who descended from the sons of Japheth and will always be hated by the sons of Shem and Ham.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
The founding fathers were libtards.
Ever heard of the Enlightenment?

The fact that different races have a different ability to create a civilization is not obvious at all. It was understood only at the end of the 19th century with the advances in racial science, and then of course this belief was destroyed with WWII.
But before the end of the 19th century, nobody understood racial differences.
covok48 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
They completely did. Hence Spain & Portugal had *elaborate* racial hiarchies in their colonies. Every Euro power had blacks & Indians as slaves. The founding fathers Had no intention of giving blacks any kind of autonomy.

If you want to blame anyone, blame the French Revolution.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Spanish and Portuguese bred with the subhumans.
Portugal in particular, is a tragedy: they used to be a great world power, and after they got injected with some subhuman blood their country became meaningless.


The anglo didn't miscegenate, but that's not because they understood the reality of race. At the time people believed in Hegel's theory of history, so it was believed that shitskins were backwards only temporarily because they lived in harsher environments and that they will soon catch up and become civilized. Hence the famous "*White man's burden*", which was predicated on the idea that White people could elevate every nigger and shitskin to our level.

> The founding fathers Had no intention of giving blacks any kind of autonomy.

No, but they also believed that "*All men are created equal*".
MartinRigggs on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I don’t think you’re giving Whites enough credit here, the brief movement toward race based science was just meant to define where and how all races are different from each other, they knew those differences were there prior, but they hadn’t been quantified yet. Whites have understood jews have very different behavioral patterns from ourselves for a thousand+ years, that’s why antisemitism has been so prevalent throughout history, the patterns were obvious and painful. If Whites could see the differences between jews and ourselves despite having a similar appearance, for sure Whites understood that blacks weren’t our equals from the moment we first encountered them, and definitely since the founding of the USA when Whites were around them on a regularly basis if they lived anywhere near a slave plantation. Any western explorer who traveled into sub Saharan Africa, India or South America knew for sure those people race comes with a myriad of differences.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I've done research on this. I've even created posts on this forum and nobody can prove me wrong. The first man who made the argument that the ability to create civilization depends on race was Gobineau in mid 19th century. Before Darwin (again mid 19th century) humanity had absolutely no fucking idea how and why human beings differ from each other, and it was only with Weismann (end of 19th century) that we discovered genetic inheritance.
You may think it's obvious that if a smart man and a smart woman have a child the son will also be smart, but that was not obvious at all before Weismann.

Yes niggers were uncivilized but this was thought to have been due to the environment, or their lack of religion, or other factors. Nobody understood that humans are genetically different. They thought that converting niggers to Christianity niggers would be civilized (which the 99% of Christians still believe to this day!).
I can blame Christianity for this of course, but even the ancient Greeks had no fucking idea. They had a bunch of weird theories about how a human being gets his character, but they didn't understand genetic inheritance.

> Whites have understood jews have very different behavioral patterns from ourselves for a thousand+ years

Yes but again they thought it was due to religion.
In fact a Jew who converted to Christianity was immediately considered "one of us" (unless it was a fake conversion). It was only the NSDAP that said that a Jew who converts to Christianity is still a Jew because it's in his blood.

Toast message