In 2016, it was White men that were driving the support for Trump but from what I've seen online regarding "White men" and voting, it would seem that both parties believe they're losing the White male vote.
Instead, of shaming White men, perhaps either party could actually do what is in White men's interests to get his vote. Why is it only White men who get shamed to encourage their vote but non-Whites and Women get both parties buying their vote? Where's the benefit to White men in voting for either party?
This election is such a joke for White men. Neither party is on their side.
> or us... We're just not at critical mass. We still need more time to cook. Maybe the whites will never be ready but I think we've seen serious progress over the past two terms. I think a Kamala win would be demoralizing, not stimulate a revolt. If Trump wins I think the media and the left continue to attack him and call him Hitler. This is probably to the disadvantage of the machine but I think they've kind of lost their grip on the reigns of TDS. That is exactly what we need. We need them to keep calling him Hitler, fascist, nazi. If he does start deporting they won't be able to help themselves. They'll have a ton of material. They'll be calling holding facilities concentration camps. They'll keep sperging about it making themselves look more and more ridiculous because this was exactly why people voted for him. By doing that they just keep dulling the blade of "racism" that they had sharpened for decades. It's been happening all this time. For the masses racism has become less and less of a threat because of the left constantly crying wolf and this has led many to recognize that racism isn't just not a threat but is the material biological reality of the world.
You're forgetting a fundamental fact. People don't revolt, wake up, reject lies, or change their behavior when they're comfortable. Comfortable people don't change. Voting for Trump, or any mainstream right winger, is only a delaying tactic. Since the mainstream right, by malicious design or genuine stupidity, can't fix our current problems. At most, they can reel back in some of the discomfort, and delay the coming collapse and mass violence. Delaying the inevitable is the worst thing we could do right now. Making people less uncomfortable is the worst thing we could do right now.
We've only seen a massive surge in red pilling precisely because people are being made uncomfortable, because the lies (of the left and right) don't make sense. Discomfort forces people to reevaluate, to reconsider, and search for better information and arguments that make the world make sense. If you take away that discomfort, you take away the impetus to seek the truth, reject the lies, to change, and to fix the problems which caused the discomfort.
Let's pretend that Trump does a lot of what he says he'll do. Let's say he's able to improve the economy and stop some, or most, of the non-white invasion. This will give more fuel to the race blind right, more fuel to the Kalergi plan left. This will hurt our own movement, because it shows that a Western nation can still "work" with all of the non-whites we have. Your goals are counter productive.
At the very least, this will hinder the acceleration of the red pills that have been dispensed since 2016, neutering any advancement almost entirely, which will give even more time for the Kalergi plan to proceed. The people in power are betting that by the time White people finally wake up and fight back, we'll be in such a small minority that we have no chance of winning. Voting for Trump, or any current right wing political leader, is only enabling that delay of action, which works in the (((globalist's))) favor.
> That's what we need. Critical mass.
No effective revolution has ever needed majority support. It only needed an effective minority and strong leaders to condense around. Currently, we don't have strong leaders to rally behind. The good voices we do have in the race realism right don't want to lead, or aren't seeking it. They're only forming local movements, at best.
> I could see a peaceful path to where we want to be via that route but even if peace is an impossibility we still need more people.
This is naive, at best. There is no peaceful solution out of this. Violence, whether we seek it or not, is inevitable. Every single metric for civilizational rise and fall is pointing downward, toward collapse. Civilizational collapse will unfurl all the bullshit, and the truth will come roaring back, including race realism. Collapse will result in mass violence. The only question is what position we'll be in what it hits, and if we're able to push it along to happen in our lifetimes, before the demographic shift is too far advanced.
> I do encourage you all to vote Trump. Your accelerationism won't work because you don't have enough gas in the tank.
The only way to overcome a lie is to think, speak, and act in the truth. If you only act in half truths, in less severe lies to overcome the worse lies, you only end up harming yourself. You can't, and you won't, ever fix a problem with more lies. Trump won't fix our problems. By voting for a false savior, by continuing to vote within the confines of an extremely corrupted system, you only press your stamp of approval on that system, and deny any other outlet for change (i.e. revolt and violence). By continually advocating for voting, you suppress and challenge all dissenting voices which are saying that it won't work, that we should revolt.
> Pascals wager
I don't see how this connects to the current discussion at all. Pascal's wager is about believing in God, for fear of punishment of not believing in God. This current discussion (or at least where you steered it with your last comment), is about voting vs revolt, comfortable lies vs uncomfortable truths, how human behavior and circumstance affects how we act. Would you mind explaining how Pascal's wager is involved in this discussion?
> You don't have the man power or the motivation enough right now to enact your American Reich fantasy but the tide of history has turned in your favor so strap in and have a little patience and some fucking white babies for God's sake.
People's views are often colored by their own motivations, triumphs, and faults. Is this your view of us, colored by your own bias, or a factual assessment?
Ever since the implementation of feminism, regardless of country, birth rates have fallen below replacement level. Every time you push women into the workforce en masse, to pursue a career over family, the birth rates fall below 2.1. There's no way to get around this, other than to stop feminism entirely, to put women back into the home, to pursue a family first. This would require a monumental shift in policy, which Trump, nor any other mainstream right winger, will do. They don't have the understanding, wherewithal, or courage to do it. Why? Because people like you still think we can only act when most people agree with us. Bullshit.
Again, your way will result in a delaying tactic, and only further the Kalergi plan, where White people are demographically replaced in our own countries. There are only a few White demographics in the U.S. right now that are having kids above replacement level: rural/farmer Whites, Mormons, Mennonites, and Amish. That's it, and it's not enough to combat open borders and mass non-white immigration, who are being artificially brought here by the millions every year. Your plan gives the Kalergi plan more time to unfold, and doesn't undo any of the damage being done to us, or fix any of the problems. Your plan only makes people less uncomfortable.