we wuz python theory n sheit
(www.livescience.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Yeah, let's see... let's see if this is a "wowza niggers reinvent the wheel!!" moment.
> Mathematicians had long thought that using trigonometry to prove the theorem was unworkable
You literally draw a triangle, see what measurements say and what the formula says. So let's not pretend this is something relevant. If it matches up, even roughly, it's proven to be ~99%+ accurate at least.
Article provides no content. It links to [this](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00029890.2024.2370240#d1e136).
> is a cyclotopic proof and not a trigonometric one
Alright, so some semantics attempt... which is btw worthless.
> blablabla
They regurgitate textbook formulas like sin²𝑥+ cos²𝑥=1, add some blabla to it.
> In this section, we verify that our proofs aren’t circular
Aha so "we looked into the textbook and are so retarded in regurgitating it that we are forced to provide evidence we aren't applying circular logic."
THEY DID NOTHING NEW. They looked up the textbook for wheel and said "if you make the wheel really round it works" and got nigger-loving cucks drooling all over the floor.