Consume Product

Except this was literally already solved 15 years ago by a White man. Now let's look at all of their w... and it's all completely derivative plagiarism.

Did they use Terrance Howard’s 1x1=2 math?

Cool! They can go back to Africa

Show the proof.

> have wowed the math community again

Yeah, let's see... let's see if this is a "wowza niggers reinvent the wheel!!" moment.

> Mathematicians had long thought that using trigonometry to prove the theorem was unworkable

You literally draw a triangle, see what measurements say and what the formula says. So let's not pretend this is something relevant. If it matches up, even roughly, it's proven to be ~99%+ accurate at least.

Article provides no content. It links to [this](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00029890.2024.2370240#d1e136).

> is a cyclotopic proof and not a trigonometric one

Alright, so some semantics attempt... which is btw worthless.

> blablabla

They regurgitate textbook formulas like sin²⁢𝑥+ cos²⁢𝑥=1, add some blabla to it.

> In this section, we verify that our proofs aren’t circular

Aha so "we looked into the textbook and are so retarded in regurgitating it that we are forced to provide evidence we aren't applying circular logic."

THEY DID NOTHING NEW. They looked up the textbook for wheel and said "if you make the wheel really round it works" and got nigger-loving cucks drooling all over the floor.

Never thought to be impossible, but the tautology of sine to the measurements never really instilled intrest in a formal proof.

First formal proof widely published in 2009. Second a few years after, and directly references the first as inspiration.

https://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/Proof109.shtml
Pythagorean Theorem via Half-Angle Formulas
Nuno Luzia
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro,
Instituto de Matemática
Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil

References
J. Zimba, On the Possibility of Trigonometric Proofs of the Pythagorean Theorem, Forum Geometricorum, Volume 9 (2009) 275-278.



Even reddit disproved this as they did the first time this ridiculous claim was made.

Yet somehow I'm more inclined to believe they spell 'math' with an F.