New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
A common argument I see used to shut people down who talk about their experiences is that their statements are simply anecdotal, not backed up by studies or statistics and should therefore be ignored.

In the modern day, studies and statistics are easily falsified, the scientific community which was once occupied by good people has been hijacked by others acting in bad faith to trick you into thinking there is logical backing to their reasoning when actually there is not.

Do not allow others to persuade you that you should ignore what is right before your eyes.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
llamatr0n on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's not an "anecdote", the academic name is "Interpretive phenomenology".

no, I'm not joking

https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920907254
a_rodent on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I think the existence of this article presents another point. Many people might say that this kind of "research" is just a waste of money, however that is not true, there is value in this "research" to those funding it, in the form of the bogus "data" and "conclusions" it returns which is used to support their bad faith arguments
llamatr0n on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
there is also value in reporting lived experience, it isn't always agenda driven

my masters thesis was titled: how I became far-right

and my supervisor was a jewish socialist, and I still got a Distinction 1st Class

also not joking, then again, it was not in the US so perhaps that made a differene
Toast message