You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
12
Mellop on scored.co
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)1 child
He did overcome more than that. Not only did he stage a successful revolution against the loathed Weimar Republic, he also beat the Communists and Reaktion (Anti-communist/Monarchists) to the punch.
Both of which were arguably better equipped to lead a revolution. The communists had already established themselves as powerful anti-democratic faction with their short-lived coup in Bavaria, they had sympathetic (jewish) media, and outside support from Stalin.
The Reaktion had support of the military higher-ups, and a large part of the population still sought a restoration of the monarchy.
Even among the radical right, Hitler had powerful competition, such as Organisation Consul, which had a strong support base from the Marinebrigade Ehrhardt and Freikorps.
And yet, National Socialism prevailed over all others, even converting large numbers of former communists to their cause.
Then again, even Hitler could not foresee that America and Britain would eternally disgrace themselves and save Stalin, save all of judeo-bolshevism from destruction. Truly, a date that shall live in infamy.
1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)2 children
>And yet, National Socialism prevailed over all others, even converting large numbers of former communists to their cause.
I think Hitler's real genius was understanding that while there was no compromise with the (((people))) behind communism, there was a way to break the propaganda that tricked workers into supporting communism with counter-propaganda. One of the greatest mistakes the American Right has made is attempting to convince communist agitators (who never argue in good faith) with logical arguments instead of countering their emotional propaganda with equally emotional propaganda of their own. Most of the populace, especially women, are not logical thinkers, and no matter how true or well worded a logical argument is, they will always resonate more with emotional messaging.
Both of which were arguably better equipped to lead a revolution. The communists had already established themselves as powerful anti-democratic faction with their short-lived coup in Bavaria, they had sympathetic (jewish) media, and outside support from Stalin.
The Reaktion had support of the military higher-ups, and a large part of the population still sought a restoration of the monarchy.
Even among the radical right, Hitler had powerful competition, such as Organisation Consul, which had a strong support base from the Marinebrigade Ehrhardt and Freikorps.
And yet, National Socialism prevailed over all others, even converting large numbers of former communists to their cause.
Then again, even Hitler could not foresee that America and Britain would eternally disgrace themselves and save Stalin, save all of judeo-bolshevism from destruction. Truly, a date that shall live in infamy.
I think Hitler's real genius was understanding that while there was no compromise with the (((people))) behind communism, there was a way to break the propaganda that tricked workers into supporting communism with counter-propaganda. One of the greatest mistakes the American Right has made is attempting to convince communist agitators (who never argue in good faith) with logical arguments instead of countering their emotional propaganda with equally emotional propaganda of their own. Most of the populace, especially women, are not logical thinkers, and no matter how true or well worded a logical argument is, they will always resonate more with emotional messaging.