1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Maybe at one time, but according to “science” if you can interbreed with them, they’re considered a sub-species no matter how far removed. So that’s how I reference them despite what I personally feel.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
Huh… you know I’m looking into it and they can’t even agree on one definition of “species” however a common one is:
“a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding.”
But then according to science different species are not supposed to be able to interbreed, if they can breed they are a sub-species. So why are tigers and lions or horses and donkeys considered different species with the ability to interbreed?
“Lions and tigers are two different species. They look different, they have different lifestyles, they vocalize differently, and they generally live on different continents, and have genetic traits specific to them.”
I retract my previous statement. You are correct, we are a different species according to their own rules.
Technically they are, and they should be treated as such to the fullest extend of the law. Jews tricking whites into treating them like wild animals is why they get away with so much.
Niggers literally kill their kids and family members over a single chicken wing
“a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding.”
But then according to science different species are not supposed to be able to interbreed, if they can breed they are a sub-species. So why are tigers and lions or horses and donkeys considered different species with the ability to interbreed?
“Lions and tigers are two different species. They look different, they have different lifestyles, they vocalize differently, and they generally live on different continents, and have genetic traits specific to them.”
I retract my previous statement. You are correct, we are a different species according to their own rules.