Deeper than that...
It is a total disruption of the family unit with fathers as the prime target.
It is a total disruption of the family unit with fathers as the prime target.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
49 comments:
Your title is wrong. The number one problem is kikes and their shitskin pets, 100 million of them they've imported since kikes ruined our immigration laws in 1965.
None of the downstream effects you've observed would have happened sans kikes owning the media and importing their shitrace non-human golems to vote for all the things that created said downstream effects.
None of the downstream effects you've observed would have happened sans kikes owning the media and importing their shitrace non-human golems to vote for all the things that created said downstream effects.
Be a better man for your child than your father was for you.
You become your parents.
Your children become you
Marry a woman that acts like you want your daughters to act.
Marry a man that acts like you want your sons to act.
Your children become you
Marry a woman that acts like you want your daughters to act.
Marry a man that acts like you want your sons to act.
lol cuck mentality, my dad was fucking amazing for the circumstances and I didn’t know how good I had it. Jewish mentality
You don't want to be a better man than your father? I want to be a better man than my father and I want my son to be a better man than me.
What the fuck is wrong with you?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
The fatherness epidemic is a real thing, its why grifters like Sneako and Tate blew up so quickly. Plenty of young men with no dad in their lives (or a dad who works every hour theyre awake at an office away from home) looking for a real father figure in their life. You seem to have encountered the latter type, We have generations of effete men raised by overbearing women who have no idea how to tell their kids "no". Of course (((you know who))) is at the root of this problem, as usual. Both the (((Protocols))) and various communist subversion plans are quite clear that the family is the biggest foe to their complete dominance (besides the Catholic Church, which they have sidelined with V2, though its slowly making a recovery, and the Church is arguably one big family anyway)
The leadership of Vatican, namely the Pope, gives me such negative views of Catholicism that I cannot take it seriously. I want to discuss this with Catholics. Maybe u/CrusaderPepe can tell us what it is like being Catholic with a satanic fraud pope and how they deal with this. Maybe it is like being an American with jews in charge of ZOG. But Catholics are not required to remain affiliated with corrupt denomination. Why not just become non denominational at that point or form new denomination?
So I converted 6 years ago, and I knew going into the Church that the Pope was a bad Pope. The thing is... I did my due diligence before going in, so it didn't bother me. I was merely Christian before becoming Catholic and went to one of those big non-denominational "churches" for people that didn't have a "denomination". By due diligence I mean that I studied the history of Christianity for hours every day after getting home from work (I was single at this time). This went on for a couple months. What I found after studying the history of Christianity, and especially reading about the early Christians, and reading the Early Church Fathers, is that the early Christians were either Catholic or some form of Eastern/Oriental/Assyrian/Syrian Orthodoxy. The 10,000+ denominations of Protestantism just aren't consistent with believing what the early Christians believed, so they just aren't real "churches". Even reading through the book of Acts you can see that the Apostles founded actual churches that were all in communion with each other all over the Roman Empire. And the early Christians talk about obedience to the bishops of these churches, how the bishop of Rome is the prime patriarch of the Church, obedience to the Church in understanding Scripture (since most Christians couldn't read Scripture anyways), how the Eucharist is the real Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, how Sunday was the Lord's Day, how even though we are saved by Faith we must work on overcoming our tendencies to sin or we will go to Hell, etc. In other words, what Protestants believe, in general, is anathema to what these early Christians believed. Thus, if you have a common sense hermeneutic you can see that it's impossible for any of the Protestant denominations to be true, since they pretty much all deny one or more of these core beliefs of the early Church Christians. Therefore, it's clear that these Protestant denominations teach novelties that are heretical to what early Christians believed. Then once you realize that, you are just left with the Apostolic Churches: Catholicism and Orthodoxy. But then Catholicism wins because again, there was always a leader of the Church that had more weight to him, even though there were other Patriarchs. Again, in the book of Acts, it's clear that St. Peter is the leader of the Church, even though the other Apostles are Patriarchs, esteemed by the Church body. And when Peter consecrated his successor Bishop in Rome, he was considered the primary Patriarch, and so our there successors. The Orthodox even acknowledge this primacy, while simultaneously refuting his universal jurisdiction, but again, if you read many early Eastern Church Fathers, you can see they acknowledged the Chair of Peter as the highest office in the Church.
TLDR: Just read a lot of Early Church Fathers, history of Christianity, and do a lot of analysis of what the early Christians believed then vs. what different "denominations" profess now, and you will come to the conclusion that I did if you are being objective. I know many others that did what I did, and became Catholic converts for the same reason.
I hope this helps. God bless!
TLDR: Just read a lot of Early Church Fathers, history of Christianity, and do a lot of analysis of what the early Christians believed then vs. what different "denominations" profess now, and you will come to the conclusion that I did if you are being objective. I know many others that did what I did, and became Catholic converts for the same reason.
I hope this helps. God bless!
I converted 2 years ago from non-denom Protestantism (but I joined the SSPX over the mainline gay "Catholic" Church), and it is a difficult situation for sure to explain that Catholicism is true while the Pope himself is completely subverted. However, it's not the faith that is wrong, it's the hierarchy that was subverted. If the RCC is the "true church", then it would be obvious that Satan and his minions would attack through subversion from the inside. I recommend [this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyMCWXaVieY) to anyone who wants to understand how we ended up here.
Liberals (in the wider sense, not the political one) want to turn everything into a human-made religion, so that atheists can come in and attack "see, it's just man-made rules that we can get rid of". They want the maximum freedom to do what they want, which includes freedom to do evil, any hierarchy, anyone saying "no, this is sinful" is therefore a problem for the Liberal.
They infiltrated the Church during the first half of the 20th century, then in the second half they replaced the Latin Mass with their man-made liturgy. Their goal is to weaken the faith that anything actually comes from the Apostles and Christianity is just some human-made celebration around a mythical tale of Christ (instead of Christ being real, God existing and morality not being based on emotions but divine, eternal laws).
So now you have a split between "traditional Catholics" (which are just regular Catholics, because Catholicism is Tradition) and "modern, liberal Catholics" (who'd rather choose to follow the liberal pope into error instead of admitting that the pope can be wrong and resisting him / criticizing him, etc.). The Orthodox Church doesn't have this problem, because they don't have a pope, with the downside that they have schisms among themselves, like the Ukranian Orthodox vs Russian Orthodox vs Greek Old Ritualists vs ...
Most Protestants in the US are some form of Baptists, who don't really have any connection to history. Converting to Protestantism is just giving up on the idea that Jesus is physically present in the Eucharist and it's all just "my mind, my bible and God" and just "spirituality" instead of physical reality. It's easy to believe, but won't take you very far. Jesus died for the based few, not the many normies (heaven would be hell if redditors were allowed to enter, if you get what I mean). Above all Jesus hates indifference, and talking to normies I understand why.
Converting to non-denom would just be giving up, which is why liberals don't really have a problem with non-denominative Christianity, because it's not a "danger to democracy", it's not a united Church, therefore it's not dangerous to their actual counter-religion of Liberalism.
Liberals (in the wider sense, not the political one) want to turn everything into a human-made religion, so that atheists can come in and attack "see, it's just man-made rules that we can get rid of". They want the maximum freedom to do what they want, which includes freedom to do evil, any hierarchy, anyone saying "no, this is sinful" is therefore a problem for the Liberal.
They infiltrated the Church during the first half of the 20th century, then in the second half they replaced the Latin Mass with their man-made liturgy. Their goal is to weaken the faith that anything actually comes from the Apostles and Christianity is just some human-made celebration around a mythical tale of Christ (instead of Christ being real, God existing and morality not being based on emotions but divine, eternal laws).
So now you have a split between "traditional Catholics" (which are just regular Catholics, because Catholicism is Tradition) and "modern, liberal Catholics" (who'd rather choose to follow the liberal pope into error instead of admitting that the pope can be wrong and resisting him / criticizing him, etc.). The Orthodox Church doesn't have this problem, because they don't have a pope, with the downside that they have schisms among themselves, like the Ukranian Orthodox vs Russian Orthodox vs Greek Old Ritualists vs ...
Most Protestants in the US are some form of Baptists, who don't really have any connection to history. Converting to Protestantism is just giving up on the idea that Jesus is physically present in the Eucharist and it's all just "my mind, my bible and God" and just "spirituality" instead of physical reality. It's easy to believe, but won't take you very far. Jesus died for the based few, not the many normies (heaven would be hell if redditors were allowed to enter, if you get what I mean). Above all Jesus hates indifference, and talking to normies I understand why.
Converting to non-denom would just be giving up, which is why liberals don't really have a problem with non-denominative Christianity, because it's not a "danger to democracy", it's not a united Church, therefore it's not dangerous to their actual counter-religion of Liberalism.
Because, as a Catholic, weve had even worse Popes before, and survived them too. For most of history, thanks to the lack of mass media, Catholics havent even known what the Pope was up to. Doesnt matter what the Pope is doing, what matters is how well we know our own faith and are following it. Those who are weak in faith will be shaken by a bad Pope, those who are strong in it will remain firm.
Doesn't a percentage of tithes given to any ordained Catholic church get laundered to the satanists at the Vatican?
Any money you pay in taxes goes to (((Satanists))), and tithes arent really a thing anymore. I dont make enough money to tithe anyway, but I think 99% of it goes to maintaining the local parish. What I would be more cautious of is donating to stuff like Catholic Charities, which got co-opted hard by the jews in some areas and now helps them with their "immigration" aka human trafficking scheme because the dumb boomers running it dont know a single Church teaching about how grievous a sin Treason is, all of their Catechism comes from media soundbites and (((Hollywood))) movies, but luckily they will die off and take the institutions theyve handed to the jews with them. I predict the Catholic Church will take a hard right turn (or more accurately, start to return to normal) in the next 10 years as all the compromisers begin to die off and the damage Vatican II and its consequences have inflicted becomes more apparent.
Those "fathers" are deadbeats created by feminism, believe it or not. If women were trained to have self respect and self preservation values for themselves & their children, these pieces of shit wouldn't even breed because they're losers who can't handle a family.
Yeah the father thing is such a blackpill to me honestly. It feels like no one actually has control of their destiny, even most White men. Everything you are is 50% (probably more) genetics, the remaining 50% is the result of whatever your dad taught you, or the result of lacking a father.
Aside from having provided actual financial support, there's pretty much no difference between my old man and the nigger dad who "went out for cigarettes" one day, and I've been an complete fucking mess for my entire life.
I often wish I had only inherited his alcoholism so that I had a more potent reprieve than my actual vices from the bottomless pit of psychic pain that is day to day life.
Aside from having provided actual financial support, there's pretty much no difference between my old man and the nigger dad who "went out for cigarettes" one day, and I've been an complete fucking mess for my entire life.
I often wish I had only inherited his alcoholism so that I had a more potent reprieve than my actual vices from the bottomless pit of psychic pain that is day to day life.
We do have a choice, we just have to make the very difficult decision to follow our goals. The man who is truly free realizes that death is inevitable, and therefore he should not fear it, but he should rather fear wasting what little time on earth God has given him.
I've been trying, but it feels impossible (emphasis on feels, I won't stop trying.) I've made very marginal improvements over a number of years, but when you break it down to the bottom line, I haven't changed in any major way from when I was a normie, despite me now being painfully aware of everything that is wrong. Knowing what to do, and lacking the strength to do it. A prisoner inside my own mind.
The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.
The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.
The problem is, you're broken (I am, too). You can find coping strategies and mechanisms, but you'll always be broken.
The best thing you can do is raise your kids differently from how you were raised; you already know the pitfalls so you're in the best position to do so.
The best thing you can do is raise your kids differently from how you were raised; you already know the pitfalls so you're in the best position to do so.
I would if things unfolded that way, but I can say that the ways in which I'm broken make having a wife or children highly unlikely.
Without going into detail, I have... *problems* related to sexuality stemming from early childhood. I'm through my mid twenties and have never had any meaningful contact with the opposite sex. Among the many problems I already struggle with, psychological castration is the most colossal one with me.
And if you can't have kids and really want to *do* something to help out our situation... Well, there are no easy roads before you, to say the least.
Without going into detail, I have... *problems* related to sexuality stemming from early childhood. I'm through my mid twenties and have never had any meaningful contact with the opposite sex. Among the many problems I already struggle with, psychological castration is the most colossal one with me.
And if you can't have kids and really want to *do* something to help out our situation... Well, there are no easy roads before you, to say the least.
This shit isn't even new
Even a decade ago girls were dressing like prostitues, its simply the modern (((fashion))) foisted upon them
The lack of father figure is definitely there too, but as many said here in the thread
Most dads today are busy chasing shekels in some jew corp rather than teach their kids morals, same with mothers
When nobody is raising the kids, (((mainstream media))) does...
Even a decade ago girls were dressing like prostitues, its simply the modern (((fashion))) foisted upon them
The lack of father figure is definitely there too, but as many said here in the thread
Most dads today are busy chasing shekels in some jew corp rather than teach their kids morals, same with mothers
When nobody is raising the kids, (((mainstream media))) does...
>Everybody I know with an absent father is fucked up.
Yes. Statistics show men are better than women at raising children.
>Unsuccessful with money, jobs, women, everything about their lives is fucked.
All outcomes for children that people measure are better with single fathers than they are with single mothers such as the ones you've listed.
>I don't even know wtf is going on now.
Jews.
> I was driving home a few days ago and 2 girls who live in the neighborhood were walking the street in bikinis. They're like 14. Tf. This isn't the first time this has happened.
You've seen nothing yet. A couple months ago, I left a club with some friends and we walked literally 1 block over in the park right next to the club where two girls who looked to be about 14 years old, wearing basically bikinis told me and my friend that they liked older men and started up a convo. They assured us they were 18yos (a lie). After it was clear we weren't going to fuck them, they ran over to another 2 guys in their 30s and these guys took them home. This is happening non-stop. You just aren't seeing it if you don't realize teenage girls are fucking older men like a bunch of sluts in heat.
> Today at the store there was a man and woman and their daughter. This little girl was probably 4. Dressed like fucking daisy duke. It was actually revolting and sort of made me sick. What kind of degenerate fuckwad do you have to be to dress your fucking infant up in that type of shit?
What you're saying is that even with the father there, it doesn't change the outcome? This would be closer to the truth.
What's going on is that men have virtually no power over women in society anymore. This is the result of what happens when men lose dominion over women. This is the trick that jew pulled on society to destroy it. The jew gave women "equality" which is really not equality but in actuality, the jew has oppressed men in order to unjustly elevate women and tipped the balance of power between the sexes such that men have no authority over women and when men have no authority over women, their daughters end up as whores and sluts.
Part of the issue is the men who would not tolerate this kind of stuff are not procreating because they know they have no power to stop it so they don't ever let it happen. The men who are fine with our judaised world have kids and then let the mothers turn the kids into whores.
We live in a state of dysgenics thanks to jews. The structure of our society leads to the worst people procreating and the best people not procreating.
Do you know why so many children are raised without fathers? It's because the fathers try to use their authority and the mother says fuck that and leaves with the kids. It's not the father's fault they're absent, it's the mother's fault the father is absent because keeping a father around is the mother's job both in her ability to pick a man (an ability she should not be given) and in the fact that she has the hole required to keep a man around if she would only use it and not be annoying/demanding or get ugly/fat. Behind every fatherless child is a harpy woman. Obviously, exceptions exist but we don't base societies on exceptions otherwise, we'd allow niggers in.
Yes. Statistics show men are better than women at raising children.
>Unsuccessful with money, jobs, women, everything about their lives is fucked.
All outcomes for children that people measure are better with single fathers than they are with single mothers such as the ones you've listed.
>I don't even know wtf is going on now.
Jews.
> I was driving home a few days ago and 2 girls who live in the neighborhood were walking the street in bikinis. They're like 14. Tf. This isn't the first time this has happened.
You've seen nothing yet. A couple months ago, I left a club with some friends and we walked literally 1 block over in the park right next to the club where two girls who looked to be about 14 years old, wearing basically bikinis told me and my friend that they liked older men and started up a convo. They assured us they were 18yos (a lie). After it was clear we weren't going to fuck them, they ran over to another 2 guys in their 30s and these guys took them home. This is happening non-stop. You just aren't seeing it if you don't realize teenage girls are fucking older men like a bunch of sluts in heat.
> Today at the store there was a man and woman and their daughter. This little girl was probably 4. Dressed like fucking daisy duke. It was actually revolting and sort of made me sick. What kind of degenerate fuckwad do you have to be to dress your fucking infant up in that type of shit?
What you're saying is that even with the father there, it doesn't change the outcome? This would be closer to the truth.
What's going on is that men have virtually no power over women in society anymore. This is the result of what happens when men lose dominion over women. This is the trick that jew pulled on society to destroy it. The jew gave women "equality" which is really not equality but in actuality, the jew has oppressed men in order to unjustly elevate women and tipped the balance of power between the sexes such that men have no authority over women and when men have no authority over women, their daughters end up as whores and sluts.
Part of the issue is the men who would not tolerate this kind of stuff are not procreating because they know they have no power to stop it so they don't ever let it happen. The men who are fine with our judaised world have kids and then let the mothers turn the kids into whores.
We live in a state of dysgenics thanks to jews. The structure of our society leads to the worst people procreating and the best people not procreating.
Do you know why so many children are raised without fathers? It's because the fathers try to use their authority and the mother says fuck that and leaves with the kids. It's not the father's fault they're absent, it's the mother's fault the father is absent because keeping a father around is the mother's job both in her ability to pick a man (an ability she should not be given) and in the fact that she has the hole required to keep a man around if she would only use it and not be annoying/demanding or get ugly/fat. Behind every fatherless child is a harpy woman. Obviously, exceptions exist but we don't base societies on exceptions otherwise, we'd allow niggers in.
And to add about the mothers leaving. It’s now incentivized with government housing and court ordered child support. This is a major reason I didn’t want kids, because I was brought up in that system and didn’t want to bring another human into it. Thankfully I didn’t become a drug addict, but still, fucks you up. I have other friends who experienced divorce as well and decided to not have kids - I suspect the same reason.
You do realize this is a symptom, not the cause. And it is systemic. This symptom is caused by females, and they are a symptom of kikes.
There are studies that show if there is only one parent to raise the kid, the kid is much better off if it’s raised by the father vs the mother.
As far as the convenience store couple, probably wasn’t the real father
As far as the convenience store couple, probably wasn’t the real father
Bikinis were invented by the Jews Louis Réard and Jacques Heim.
https://www.anumuseum.org.il/blog/bikini/
Thanks Jews for this invention of immodesty. How could we ever live without or women running around in underwear on the street.
https://www.anumuseum.org.il/blog/bikini/
Thanks Jews for this invention of immodesty. How could we ever live without or women running around in underwear on the street.
I've noticed the same thing. The weakness of men in the west, destroyed from all angles, had caused their families to be weak too.
Toast message
You show me the problem, I will show you the jew behind it.
It was the process of comidification of the family unit making them fungible goods, interchangeable parts, optimizing economic and military efficiency.
Intergenerational traditional families were more economically stable and efficient for people but not for corporations or tax collectors. No need for child care or elder care means less economic activity.