New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
43
posted 1 year ago by RJ567 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +43Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
21 comments:
12
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 1 child
Its literal Satanism.

The devil wants to destroy all order and beauty simply because he is miserable, and so we must be miserable too. All forms of Judeo-Satanism (Kabbalah, Sabbatean-Frankism,Masonry,etc) is all based on the fundamental Satanic lie that an earthly paradise will be created if all that divides and distinguishes is destroyed, when in fact the true result will be something worse than Hell.
10
TerrorAndSlaughter on scored.co
1 year ago 10 points (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror )
Satanism is denying the order imposed by God and become like gods. That is, defining your own good/evil ordering of things. The philosophical term is moral relativism. God's order is understanding human nature as it was given to us. From our nature/essence we can work out what good and evil is. Most of this was worked out by the 13th century and then later used by the American founding fathers. The Satanic rejection of our essence is called existentialism. One of the pillars of Leftism/Satanism is that humans are free to define their own nature. This is why they can say that a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman. The individual has authority over what they are and this includes broad powers over what is good/evil for them.
  
Of course since they aren't actually like God, they are ordering their life according to a nature they don't actually have. They suffer as a result and blame it on everything but themselves. What they really want to be free of accountability and call you names for not indulging them socially and financially.
11
RJ567 on scored.co
1 year ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror ) 3 children
"And so, anything that reinforces the idea of those ties that bind as a good thing is evil, or, to them, "fascist"

So Rockwell is "fascist" because his pictures of normal people reinforce the idea of normalcy as a good thing

Babies are fascist because they serve as a reminder that motherhood is a biological desire of women

Fitness is fascist because it reinforces the idea that you ought look good and strive for improvement of the self

Fashion is fascist for the same reason: to them, one ought be able to wear anything rather than dress well for a purpose

And on and on it goes. Anything a normal person of 50 years ago would see as so obvious it needn't be stated is evil because it shows that a standard of behavior exists, something they hate."

https://nitter.poast.org/Will_Tanner_1/status/1841487133334286413
BlippiIsAPedo on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
You are getting it. Disorder is what the kikes desire. You cause disorder by saying you are creating order by making everyone equal.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
Don't you see though? It actually *is* "fascist". Fascism, and adjacent ideologies, are the natural states of things. If you look at any hierarchical ancient society, they were all "fascist" in essence. Not even just in Europe, but practically everywhere. Mussolini just slapped a name onto what is natural humanity and applied some economic tenants to it. The rome of Julius Caesar forwards is probably the greatest example of prototypical fascism, but the baseline of mussolinis fascism can be found in *literally* any ancient to early modern hierarchical society (spoiler alert, it's virtually every single fucking one of them. Even pygmy negroes in Africa have a hierarchy. Actual chimpanzees have a hierarchy.)

To have no hierarchy is to set up your entire nation, culture, governance, and race on a race to oblivion. Even Marxists had to implement a hierarchy to not collapse immediately like the paris commune. Humans are pack-oriented creatures. We are not solitary beings like tigers. To have order in a tribe one *must* have hierarchy and this applies to any group of people that numbers over about 4 or 5. Even animals in the wild that are also pack oriented have an innate sense for this that people have entirely lost.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
This is so true.

Liberalism goes against human nature, because it sees humans as individuals and not as social animals.
deleted 1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Communism is literally in the Bible, Christcuck.

In the book of Acts the first thing the Apostles do is implement fucking communism.
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Erase99 on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
"I support sodomy. Let me tell you about what is and isn't evil."
systemthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
"There is no objective good or evil. Let me tell you why racism is objectively evil and sodomy is objectively good."
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
Anything from the Enlightenment is of Satan.

All of it. It wasnt some magical dedication to "liberty,fraternity,and equality" that built the western world, it was the Classical Christian morality and the Blood, Sweat, and often Dead Bodies of the White Christian Men who wanted to build a better world. The Enlightenment is an usurper, it claims the achievements of all that came before it and all that occurred during it (but most of the time which it opposed for the crime of being "reactionary"), while laying all its own crimes at the feet of its enemies. A Lie to truly end all Lies.
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The enlightenment was an objective good from a *scientific* standpoint because a plethora of new things were discovered that advanced us, our understanding of the world, and our standard of living tremendously. You cannot deny that men like Isaac Newton made some of the most groundbreaking work since Archimedes.

From the philosophical standpoint, it was a complete dumpsterfire that was one of the first steps in the domino effect that led us to the neoliberal ultracapitalist jewish led and spiritually vacant hellscape that we currently call the west.

The enlightenment is a tale of 2 extremes. I used to fully hate it and only focused on my latter point, but I've come to realize that there was also a lot of good that came from it. That being said, the latter point almost nullifies all of it because it quite literally ruined us, completely, over time.

Popular misconception is that you need the latter for the former. Not really. The Renaissance didn't need enlightenment type philosophy to blossom, so neither did the enlightenment. Corrupted philsophers just took advantage of the climate and the fact that people generally had a much more open mind to pour the worst shit you could ever imagine into their brains.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I firmly believe all the scientific discoveries would have still taken place, at worst maybe at a slower pace, since human (especially white human) curiosity is one of the most powerful forces on the plan.

At the same time, the jews have flooded us with so much bunk "science" (like psychology), we might be spending the next 100 years sorting through what is real and what is fake.
systemthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Gigabased. Western society has been steadily declining for well over 300 years, it's just accelerated over the last century.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I'd extend this to the idea of individualism as well.

When we talk about individual rights, we should not speak about rights for their own sake, because there is absolutely no way to justify that in any philosophical framework. Rights exist to allow every child of God to follow the proper path laid out for them, not to do whatever they like. This is why all societies remove the rights of criminals; they have been shown to have strayed from their path.

That's why prisons should be modeled after monasteries, as opposed to public schools.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
>That's why prisons should be modeled after monasteries

One of the unspoken purposes of monasteries was for penitent criminals to find a way to pay society back for their crimes.
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
JesusSupporter33 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
What kind of last name is Soutar? Considering that he's blaspheming against Christ, I have a good guess.
Toast message