Consume Product

https://www.hakaimagazine.com/features/prejudice-pride

I have a lot to say about this article. On one hand, it's funny to see leftists wax poetic about the holy natives (Ainu) being wiped out by the proto-Trumpean colonizers (Yamato Japanese) when they constantly whine about how horrible the "noble savage" myth is. On the other hand, one is reminded of the hypocrisy which is the foundation of all leftism. Leftists can see invasion, ethnic cleansing, etc. as long as it is happening to a non-European population. Change this, and the whole response shifts to blaming the (European) natives for not worshiping the primitive invaders as gods.

This line in particular: "“You have to move somewhere, you can’t speak your language, you can’t live with your family, you watch your sister raped in front of you, you watch your siblings die of starvation, you witness your animals slaughtered for fun.” Sounds like Haitians and other assorted mud folk in Europe, no?

Are we Whites not experiencing this right now, in all our lands? And what is the leftist response? More hatred, more denying the truth, more glorification of the invaders. All leftism is an exercise in bad faith and they have no love beyond themselves. If the Japanese want the world leftist press to turn against the Ainu, just start moving hordes of Afro-middle east invaders into Ainu territory. When the Ainu complain that the newcomers are abusing them, just remind them that diversity is a strength and they are a bunch of White supremacists.

I'm not sure that the ainu are/were actually white though. Their genetics, and the genetics of the jomon, still cluster heavily around east asians.

However, it is true that they have a significant amount of gene flow from the caucasian ancient north eurasians.

On that note, I posit a theory that the caucasoid skull is ancestral to the mongoloid skull given the amount of primitive heavily isolated east Asian groups (ainu, Polynesians, some natice americans, etc) that have large and robust caucasoid skulls who would not have evolved a mongoloid phenotype in east Asia. Some of these people also have little to no ANE dna. The skull shape is also very similar (much moreso than a caucasoid or mongoloid and a negroid skull). Southeast asians and negritos are irrelevant to the question as they are mixed with dravidian/Australoid types, itself a heavily devolved caucasoid type.

Tianyuan man also had a very long and robust, caucasoid skull, and he was decidedly not west eurasian at all, instead being the earliest example of distinctly east eurasian blood