You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> It's not a strawman
Lying about what others say = strawman.
>fair compensation is literally what I'm advocating for.
Nope. You’re advocating for a centralized authority to dictate to the entire economy a specific wage for a specific (or generalized) job. Every single economic rule—and every single function of linguistics—denounces the application of “fair” in this definition.
>[you’re a neoconservative because you say the opposite of what neoconservatives say]
Explicitly told it wouldn’t work and you still do it. Why not just turn your account over to someone else and clock out for good?
> No it really isn't, communism is a stateless, moneyless classless society, communists are people who advocate for such a thing.
Thanks for repeating lies only communists have ever said.
>I don't know how to read this graph
Thanks for admitting I’m right *yet again.* ***Shut the absolute fuck up about a topic when you admit to knowing absolutely nothing about it.*** This is literally the first fucking graph that anyone learning anything about economics is shown.
> I'm a National Socialist
Disproven by your own advocacy. You’re not fooling anyone.
>you have demonstrated that you clearly don't understand what marxism actually is.
Thanks for admitting that I know exactly what communism is.
>no it’s not
Five-year-old response; you have conceded the argument and admitted that I don’t have to choose between your falsely dichotomical choices you invented out of nothing. You are physically incapable of citing where anything you claim was actually said by a real person. Reported for troll account.
> you argued that it's fundamentally bad for governments to intervene in anything.
Strawman again. Reported for troll account.
> because
Strawman again. Reported for troll account.
> Bro thinks they're the same thing
Strawman again. Reported for troll account.
> According to the man who thinks ideologies that hate each other are the same.
Strawman again. Reported for troll account.
>WAAAAA MOMMY THE BAD GOY PROVED ME WRONG *HE* IS THE TROLL NOT MEEEEEEEEE
You are an avowed communist. You cannot read anything anyone else says. You are incapable of replying to anything anyone else says. You’re a troll account. Eat shit and die.
Strawman definition: "an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument."
>Nope. You’re advocating for a centralized authority to dictate to the entire economy a specific wage for a specific (or generalized) job. Every single economic rule—and every single function of linguistics—denounces the application of “fair” in this definition.
Really, capitalists don't like having operational costs raised, lemme play the world's smallest violin.
>Thanks for admitting I’m right yet again. Shut the absolute fuck up about a topic when you admit to knowing absolutely nothing about it. This is literally the first fucking graph that anyone learning anything about economics is shown.
I literally posted a study showing minimum wage increase worker productivity hahahahahahaa.
>Disproven by your own advocacy. You’re not fooling anyone.
Advocating for.... fair labour laws?
You are aware Hitler's Germany did literally everything I'm advocating for right?
>Thanks for repeating lies only communists have ever said.
Because that's what communism is, guess what, having your trash collected isn't communism, having roads paved isn't communism. What you're saying is disproven with even the laziest amount of research.
>Explicitly told it wouldn’t work and you still do it. Why not just turn your account over to someone else and clock out for good?
Sorry it doesn't work? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_minimum_wage
I would reply to the rest of it but it's clear to me that you're very mentally unstable. Look, please just go outside and maybe if you take a shower a woman might not be utterly repulsed by you ok.
> Strawman definition: "an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument."
Yep, you did that.
> Really, capitalists don't like having operational costs raised, lemme play the world's smallest violin.
Said nothing about capitalists. Nice use of a word invented by a commie, by the way.
>a study
Wow, I definitely care. It’s totally real because it says it is, right? Ignore millennia of proof to the contrary, of course. A study said so.
>[strawman again]
If it wasn’t clear to you (it wasn’t; your IQ is below 70), the last six replies have been merely mocking you because you refuse to reply to what’s actually written.
>[strawman again]
It’s not even fun anymore when you’re not even pretending to hold an actual conversation.
>[wikipedia link, proving absolutely nothing it thinks it’s trying to prove]
I mean, give me *something*. Pretend to be able to stay on topic, for fuck’s sake, yid.
>[spam only leftists and redditors have ever said]
Yes, when you refuse to reply to anything anyone has actually said, you get treated like the subhuman ape you actually are.
>you can’t refute it
There’s nothing to refute. By the laws of physics themselves it is objectively incorrect. Every single location with a minimum wage would be objectively, universally, and axiomatically better without it. You are a communist.
Lying about what others say = strawman.
>fair compensation is literally what I'm advocating for.
Nope. You’re advocating for a centralized authority to dictate to the entire economy a specific wage for a specific (or generalized) job. Every single economic rule—and every single function of linguistics—denounces the application of “fair” in this definition.
>[you’re a neoconservative because you say the opposite of what neoconservatives say]
Explicitly told it wouldn’t work and you still do it. Why not just turn your account over to someone else and clock out for good?
> No it really isn't, communism is a stateless, moneyless classless society, communists are people who advocate for such a thing.
Thanks for repeating lies only communists have ever said.
>I don't know how to read this graph
Thanks for admitting I’m right *yet again.* ***Shut the absolute fuck up about a topic when you admit to knowing absolutely nothing about it.*** This is literally the first fucking graph that anyone learning anything about economics is shown.
> I'm a National Socialist
Disproven by your own advocacy. You’re not fooling anyone.
>you have demonstrated that you clearly don't understand what marxism actually is.
Thanks for admitting that I know exactly what communism is.
>no it’s not
Five-year-old response; you have conceded the argument and admitted that I don’t have to choose between your falsely dichotomical choices you invented out of nothing. You are physically incapable of citing where anything you claim was actually said by a real person. Reported for troll account.
> you argued that it's fundamentally bad for governments to intervene in anything.
Strawman again. Reported for troll account.
> because
Strawman again. Reported for troll account.
> Bro thinks they're the same thing
Strawman again. Reported for troll account.
> According to the man who thinks ideologies that hate each other are the same.
Strawman again. Reported for troll account.
>WAAAAA MOMMY THE BAD GOY PROVED ME WRONG *HE* IS THE TROLL NOT MEEEEEEEEE
You are an avowed communist. You cannot read anything anyone else says. You are incapable of replying to anything anyone else says. You’re a troll account. Eat shit and die.
Strawman definition: "an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument."
>Nope. You’re advocating for a centralized authority to dictate to the entire economy a specific wage for a specific (or generalized) job. Every single economic rule—and every single function of linguistics—denounces the application of “fair” in this definition.
Really, capitalists don't like having operational costs raised, lemme play the world's smallest violin.
>Thanks for admitting I’m right yet again. Shut the absolute fuck up about a topic when you admit to knowing absolutely nothing about it. This is literally the first fucking graph that anyone learning anything about economics is shown.
I literally posted a study showing minimum wage increase worker productivity hahahahahahaa.
>Disproven by your own advocacy. You’re not fooling anyone.
Advocating for.... fair labour laws?
You are aware Hitler's Germany did literally everything I'm advocating for right?
>Thanks for repeating lies only communists have ever said.
Because that's what communism is, guess what, having your trash collected isn't communism, having roads paved isn't communism. What you're saying is disproven with even the laziest amount of research.
>Explicitly told it wouldn’t work and you still do it. Why not just turn your account over to someone else and clock out for good?
Sorry it doesn't work? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_minimum_wage
I would reply to the rest of it but it's clear to me that you're very mentally unstable. Look, please just go outside and maybe if you take a shower a woman might not be utterly repulsed by you ok.
Yep, you did that.
> Really, capitalists don't like having operational costs raised, lemme play the world's smallest violin.
Said nothing about capitalists. Nice use of a word invented by a commie, by the way.
>a study
Wow, I definitely care. It’s totally real because it says it is, right? Ignore millennia of proof to the contrary, of course. A study said so.
>[strawman again]
If it wasn’t clear to you (it wasn’t; your IQ is below 70), the last six replies have been merely mocking you because you refuse to reply to what’s actually written.
>[strawman again]
It’s not even fun anymore when you’re not even pretending to hold an actual conversation.
>[wikipedia link, proving absolutely nothing it thinks it’s trying to prove]
I mean, give me *something*. Pretend to be able to stay on topic, for fuck’s sake, yid.
>[spam only leftists and redditors have ever said]
Boring. Kill self.
What proof, what you sent to me was also a study.
>your IQ is below 70
Ad hominem
>[wikipedia link, proving absolutely nothing it thinks it’s trying to prove]
Ok, so you can't refute it.
Nothing else you've written here is worth responding to.
>a study
You’re too stupid to be alive.
>ad hominem
Yes, when you refuse to reply to anything anyone has actually said, you get treated like the subhuman ape you actually are.
>you can’t refute it
There’s nothing to refute. By the laws of physics themselves it is objectively incorrect. Every single location with a minimum wage would be objectively, universally, and axiomatically better without it. You are a communist.