lefty brimstone meme thinking this is an own
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
The *office* of the Pope is indeed the *leader* of the Church. The Faithful are the *actual* Church; that is, the Bride of Christ.
>but he is the successor to Peter, who was literally called the rock on which the church is built by Jesus himself, and God's representative on earth
Correct, yes.
>You being against him makes you the excommunicated apostate, buddy
Wrong
>your interpretations aren't cannon, and what he says is.
That's absolutely not how it works. The "papal infallibility to decide scriptural canon" thing has only been invoked *twice* in the entire 2,000 year history of the Catholic Church. Once was to specifically delineate Mary's Immaculate Conception, and I forget what the other one was. The current antipope running his mouth about niggers and "immigrants" has nothing to do with nor does it decide official Catholic doctrine, teaching, scriptural canon, etc. Its just him running his mouth. Which he still shouldn't do, regardless of who's occupying the chair of Peter. Which again, *YOU WOULD KNOW IF YOU'D HAVE ACTUALLY LOOKED INTO THE MATTER.* But since you *haven't*, you don't know.
As for "interpretations", there's no such thing as *interpretations* of Scripture. It's only what Scripture *is*, and what it *isn't*. I can provide ample evidence and books for further reading to indicate that my "interpretation" of Scripture is in fact what Scripture *is*. I'd ask you again if you really cared to learn but by now it's clear that you do not.
>Sorry, but do you think your own special anti kike and nigger Christianity will be the one that is allowed and in charge under op's Christian theocracy?
It was in the Third Reich.
>I know what I'm talking about just fine
No you don't, and you've already provided ample proof of that.
Scriptures ARE interpreted, most literally from latin into English. That required INTERPRETATION AND TRANSPOSITION. Why are there so many different bibles if scripture "isnt interpreted" and just "IS"? That's a rhetorical question. Do you even logic?
Then you just go on to cope post. Thanks, have a nice day.
Are you retarded or something? It comes as part of a *PROCESS*, and when the *PROCESS* is not followed, then there is no infallibility. It could not be a simpler concept to grasp.
>That required INTERPRETATION AND TRANSPOSITION
That only requires *translation*. Which can be, has been, and is still being done deliberately false to push subversive narratives from within and without.
>Why are there so many different bibles if scripture "isnt interpreted"
It *is* being "interpreted" retard, that's the whole point. Have you *looked* at the state of modern "christianity" lately? Is that not the ultimate proof that "interpreting" the Scriptures willy nilly is doomed to failure?