You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Ninjatacos on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
You acknowledge the idea papal infallability right after saying "nuh uhh" when I call you an apostate for not being a nigger foot washer like your pope, as in, IMMEDIATELY contradicting yourself.
Scriptures ARE interpreted, most literally from latin into English. That required INTERPRETATION AND TRANSPOSITION. Why are there so many different bibles if scripture "isnt interpreted" and just "IS"? That's a rhetorical question. Do you even logic?
Then you just go on to cope post. Thanks, have a nice day.
Are you retarded or something? It comes as part of a *PROCESS*, and when the *PROCESS* is not followed, then there is no infallibility. It could not be a simpler concept to grasp.
>That required INTERPRETATION AND TRANSPOSITION
That only requires *translation*. Which can be, has been, and is still being done deliberately false to push subversive narratives from within and without.
>Why are there so many different bibles if scripture "isnt interpreted"
It *is* being "interpreted" retard, that's the whole point. Have you *looked* at the state of modern "christianity" lately? Is that not the ultimate proof that "interpreting" the Scriptures willy nilly is doomed to failure?
Scriptures ARE interpreted, most literally from latin into English. That required INTERPRETATION AND TRANSPOSITION. Why are there so many different bibles if scripture "isnt interpreted" and just "IS"? That's a rhetorical question. Do you even logic?
Then you just go on to cope post. Thanks, have a nice day.
Are you retarded or something? It comes as part of a *PROCESS*, and when the *PROCESS* is not followed, then there is no infallibility. It could not be a simpler concept to grasp.
>That required INTERPRETATION AND TRANSPOSITION
That only requires *translation*. Which can be, has been, and is still being done deliberately false to push subversive narratives from within and without.
>Why are there so many different bibles if scripture "isnt interpreted"
It *is* being "interpreted" retard, that's the whole point. Have you *looked* at the state of modern "christianity" lately? Is that not the ultimate proof that "interpreting" the Scriptures willy nilly is doomed to failure?