You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
Ninjatacos on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
I'm not even secular. I believe in God, our creator. Is obvious when you just look at creation itself.
What I don't believe is that only one special boy ever existed and if you don't say the magic words about loving him you go to forever burny land after death. I have a personal relationship with God, and I don't need Jesus's permission to do so.
Actually, you do. "No one goes to the Father except through me" and "If you love the Father then you will also love me" is quite clearly outlined in the Gospels in many places.
So says a book written by men, and the current leader of that group of men is a nigger and fag lover who recently said, literally, that Christianity isn't special and all religions are equal.
You have no leg to stand on. Your an apostate too if you go against your papa pope.
>Your an apostate too if you go against your papa pope.
The Catholic Church's own Catechism says that leaders who go against Church teachings are automatically excommunicated and the faithful are not to follow them. Which you would know if you had legitimately looked into the affair. Furthermore, you would know all about the subversion campaigns enacted by the kikes against Christianity in the US and the Catholic Church in particular starting immediately following the bolshevik revolution in Russia and ultimately culminating in vatican II.
So I ask you again, do you really want to know or are you just trolling? Because I'm not going to waste my time explaining it all to you unless you *legitimately* want to know, and possibly learn a thing or two.
The pope IS the church. You dont have to like it, but he is the successor to Peter, who was literally called the rock on which the church is built by Jesus himself, and God's representative on earth. You being against him makes you the excommunicated apostate, buddy. You might not like it, and subverting teachings or not, your interpretations aren't cannon, and what he says is.
Sorry, but do you think your own special anti kike and nigger Christianity will be the one that is allowed and in charge under op's Christian theocracy?
There's nothing i need to know from you, arrogant boy. I know what I'm talking about just fine. It's you who needs some serious self reflection.
The *office* of the Pope is indeed the *leader* of the Church. The Faithful are the *actual* Church; that is, the Bride of Christ.
>but he is the successor to Peter, who was literally called the rock on which the church is built by Jesus himself, and God's representative on earth
Correct, yes.
>You being against him makes you the excommunicated apostate, buddy
Wrong
>your interpretations aren't cannon, and what he says is.
That's absolutely not how it works. The "papal infallibility to decide scriptural canon" thing has only been invoked *twice* in the entire 2,000 year history of the Catholic Church. Once was to specifically delineate Mary's Immaculate Conception, and I forget what the other one was. The current antipope running his mouth about niggers and "immigrants" has nothing to do with nor does it decide official Catholic doctrine, teaching, scriptural canon, etc. Its just him running his mouth. Which he still shouldn't do, regardless of who's occupying the chair of Peter. Which again, *YOU WOULD KNOW IF YOU'D HAVE ACTUALLY LOOKED INTO THE MATTER.* But since you *haven't*, you don't know.
As for "interpretations", there's no such thing as *interpretations* of Scripture. It's only what Scripture *is*, and what it *isn't*. I can provide ample evidence and books for further reading to indicate that my "interpretation" of Scripture is in fact what Scripture *is*. I'd ask you again if you really cared to learn but by now it's clear that you do not.
>Sorry, but do you think your own special anti kike and nigger Christianity will be the one that is allowed and in charge under op's Christian theocracy?
It was in the Third Reich.
>I know what I'm talking about just fine
No you don't, and you've already provided ample proof of that.
What I don't believe is that only one special boy ever existed and if you don't say the magic words about loving him you go to forever burny land after death. I have a personal relationship with God, and I don't need Jesus's permission to do so.
You have no leg to stand on. Your an apostate too if you go against your papa pope.
See you in the gulags, fellow nigger faggot.
The Catholic Church's own Catechism says that leaders who go against Church teachings are automatically excommunicated and the faithful are not to follow them. Which you would know if you had legitimately looked into the affair. Furthermore, you would know all about the subversion campaigns enacted by the kikes against Christianity in the US and the Catholic Church in particular starting immediately following the bolshevik revolution in Russia and ultimately culminating in vatican II.
So I ask you again, do you really want to know or are you just trolling? Because I'm not going to waste my time explaining it all to you unless you *legitimately* want to know, and possibly learn a thing or two.
Sorry, but do you think your own special anti kike and nigger Christianity will be the one that is allowed and in charge under op's Christian theocracy?
There's nothing i need to know from you, arrogant boy. I know what I'm talking about just fine. It's you who needs some serious self reflection.
The *office* of the Pope is indeed the *leader* of the Church. The Faithful are the *actual* Church; that is, the Bride of Christ.
>but he is the successor to Peter, who was literally called the rock on which the church is built by Jesus himself, and God's representative on earth
Correct, yes.
>You being against him makes you the excommunicated apostate, buddy
Wrong
>your interpretations aren't cannon, and what he says is.
That's absolutely not how it works. The "papal infallibility to decide scriptural canon" thing has only been invoked *twice* in the entire 2,000 year history of the Catholic Church. Once was to specifically delineate Mary's Immaculate Conception, and I forget what the other one was. The current antipope running his mouth about niggers and "immigrants" has nothing to do with nor does it decide official Catholic doctrine, teaching, scriptural canon, etc. Its just him running his mouth. Which he still shouldn't do, regardless of who's occupying the chair of Peter. Which again, *YOU WOULD KNOW IF YOU'D HAVE ACTUALLY LOOKED INTO THE MATTER.* But since you *haven't*, you don't know.
As for "interpretations", there's no such thing as *interpretations* of Scripture. It's only what Scripture *is*, and what it *isn't*. I can provide ample evidence and books for further reading to indicate that my "interpretation" of Scripture is in fact what Scripture *is*. I'd ask you again if you really cared to learn but by now it's clear that you do not.
>Sorry, but do you think your own special anti kike and nigger Christianity will be the one that is allowed and in charge under op's Christian theocracy?
It was in the Third Reich.
>I know what I'm talking about just fine
No you don't, and you've already provided ample proof of that.
you have to actually Kean it when you confess faith.
and you say you have a relationship with God but you reject Jesus.
well Jesus is God, so get that confusion sorted out.