You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
I wish this article went further into specifics. It's briefly complaining about quantum field theory but referencing Schrodinger and Heisenberg, neither of which were jews? Or did I miss something?
I'm not particularly adept at it but I appreciate math because it has no bullshit factor. Either the math works or it doesn't. I understand what it's talking about regarding dogmatic science but I find it strange that it's attacking physics. Physics is probably the one field of science most innoculated from dogmatic science because of the math requirements. You can't just handwave bullshit "models" and massage your statistics like epidemiologists do. Or say, the entire field of psychology. At the end of the day the work of quantum physics seems to build a unifying model of understanding, and to be able to do that with spooky bullshit absent a unified mathematic model would be impossible. So if the math works then the math works.
A good example, I think, of what the article is talking about is string theory, but it didn't exist when the article was written. The original description of elctron orbits has been proven false. While (((Bohr)))'s nuclear model wasn't correct, it's still used to introduce the concept because it's "workable enough" to help students get familiar with valence electron theory. Electrons do not orbit, they exist in fuzzy clouds of indefinable probability that defy measurement (thus we get the uncertainty principle). Which seems to be what the author is referring to with his complaints about Schrodinger's electron model existing in superposition as "dancing around the atom".
Unfortunately the article has one really big elephant in the room and it's that it was written seven years before a bunch of those dogmatic jews split the atom while the Aryan physicists in Germany failed to do so. And some of those physicists who did so were former German citizen jews.
> You can't just handwave bullshit "models" and massage your statistics like epidemiologists do.
Ackshually that is what a lot of physicists do. String theory has been a hot bed of bullshit for a while. There is still no evidence of dark matter despite billions of funding looking for it. The particle accelerators only get results by crunching petabytes of data. (((Einstein))) Stole his work from Whites. Splitting the atom is an engineering problem: uranium enrichment is a massive undertaking.
Yes and I mentioned string theory. The thing is, string theory isn't taken seriously by most physicists specifically because of the spooky magic they had to do with the math to reconcile their unified theory.
String theory isn't "discredited" because you can't really prove it wrong, it lingers around as something to ponder, but that's about it. *Technically* the math behind string theory plays out, it's just kind of games they played to make it so.
Electron probability isn't indefinable, they just exist as an entire bell curve of probability at once. Physical observation causes probability scope collapse into particle positions. Waves LARP as particles.
Right but that's why I don't understand the article. Now it was written in 1938 and all this shit was cutting edge science. I know that classical physicists weren't happy with quantum physics because the root of quantum physics is "everything you thought you knew was wrong". We don't know why on atomic scales most laws of physics break down. We just know they do and guys like Fermi, Rutherford, Pauli, Lorentz, Casimir, de Broglie, etc. were writing the rules from scratch.
Maybe the author of this article was one of those people. Deutsche Physik, which is what this writer sounds like he supports, was frankly a mistake and the reason all the atomic bomb creators ended up in America. Quantum physics was new and not well understood but nearly a hundred years later and it's still stood up, which means the detractors had to be wrong.
Well if the math works, the math works. And unfortunately nobody else has a better explanation.
Agreed. Although at this level I don't know if some of the ideas describe reality or merely satisfy equations from someone's math notes. "Dark matter" is a good example of this. Before COVID I thought science was self-correcting, now, even if a lot of high-level physics is wrong, I'm not sure we will ever find out.
I'm not particularly adept at it but I appreciate math because it has no bullshit factor. Either the math works or it doesn't. I understand what it's talking about regarding dogmatic science but I find it strange that it's attacking physics. Physics is probably the one field of science most innoculated from dogmatic science because of the math requirements. You can't just handwave bullshit "models" and massage your statistics like epidemiologists do. Or say, the entire field of psychology. At the end of the day the work of quantum physics seems to build a unifying model of understanding, and to be able to do that with spooky bullshit absent a unified mathematic model would be impossible. So if the math works then the math works.
A good example, I think, of what the article is talking about is string theory, but it didn't exist when the article was written. The original description of elctron orbits has been proven false. While (((Bohr)))'s nuclear model wasn't correct, it's still used to introduce the concept because it's "workable enough" to help students get familiar with valence electron theory. Electrons do not orbit, they exist in fuzzy clouds of indefinable probability that defy measurement (thus we get the uncertainty principle). Which seems to be what the author is referring to with his complaints about Schrodinger's electron model existing in superposition as "dancing around the atom".
Unfortunately the article has one really big elephant in the room and it's that it was written seven years before a bunch of those dogmatic jews split the atom while the Aryan physicists in Germany failed to do so. And some of those physicists who did so were former German citizen jews.
Ackshually that is what a lot of physicists do. String theory has been a hot bed of bullshit for a while. There is still no evidence of dark matter despite billions of funding looking for it. The particle accelerators only get results by crunching petabytes of data. (((Einstein))) Stole his work from Whites. Splitting the atom is an engineering problem: uranium enrichment is a massive undertaking.
String theory isn't "discredited" because you can't really prove it wrong, it lingers around as something to ponder, but that's about it. *Technically* the math behind string theory plays out, it's just kind of games they played to make it so.
Maybe the author of this article was one of those people. Deutsche Physik, which is what this writer sounds like he supports, was frankly a mistake and the reason all the atomic bomb creators ended up in America. Quantum physics was new and not well understood but nearly a hundred years later and it's still stood up, which means the detractors had to be wrong.
Well if the math works, the math works. And unfortunately nobody else has a better explanation.