Based…. Everywhere you go every one arrives at the same conclusion: jews suck
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
13 comments:
7
1 year ago
7 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+7Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
An unexpected rabbit hole I fell into is that everything we know about black holes either comes from Jewish scientists or Stephen Hawking (the original was replaced by a body double who was also an Epstein customer). Naturally I'm skeptical of anything regarding that subject.
Black holes are not inescapable gravity wells. Relativity (which itself is a theory stolen from Whites) limits density. The volume of a cube with mass is less than the product of it's sides because mass distorts space. This affects many things, like the orbit of Star systems within a galaxy. This also means dark matter doesn't exist.
If academia weren't fucked I could get a grant for this.
If academia weren't fucked I could get a grant for this.
Relativity is Lorentz's equations combined with some thought experiments about objects in motion.
At some point most White boys ask "why is the speed of light represented by *c*?"
That's because Lorentz came up with the term to describe the speed of *causality*, which is the same speed that light travels. Einstein based all his work on Lorentz's, but global jewry gave Einstein all the credit. This gave theoretical physics honor that rightfully belongs to experimental ohysics.
Don't get me started on the fact that the speed of light is in flux, and only "constant" by human decree. Some "dogmatic scientist" outright rejected the fact that the speed of light changes, despite the fact that science is advanced by observing overlooked variables in phenomena.
At some point most White boys ask "why is the speed of light represented by *c*?"
That's because Lorentz came up with the term to describe the speed of *causality*, which is the same speed that light travels. Einstein based all his work on Lorentz's, but global jewry gave Einstein all the credit. This gave theoretical physics honor that rightfully belongs to experimental ohysics.
Don't get me started on the fact that the speed of light is in flux, and only "constant" by human decree. Some "dogmatic scientist" outright rejected the fact that the speed of light changes, despite the fact that science is advanced by observing overlooked variables in phenomena.
I'm more suspicious of (((dark matter))) than I am of black holes. Its a literal scientific cope to justify their current jewed models. Its logically almost impossible for the universe to consist of a majority of matter that somehow is completely undetectable and yet is only present in deep space. I'm pretty sure some jew in the physics field accidentally multiplied by 10 when he should have divided by 100 when they were calculating the mass of the universe, and instead of going back to look where he screwed up, he just said "wow, must be this magical matter that is totally everywhere, but no, I cannot show it to you".
Talmudic jews are masters of dissimulation, even better than most women.
They are the origin point of the kind of thinking that says "American kids aren't eating enough vegetables. How do we fix this? Let's define tomato sauce as a vegetable! Now they're getting enough." (This isn't a hypothetical, it was an actual act of congress.) It's shameless lawyerism, which is just legalistic judaism.
To a jew, there is no underlying Reality, shy and eager to be known. There is only phenomena within minds. Counterfeits are just as valuable as - or even moe valuable than - the genuine article.
All dogma is a jewish way of thinking, a method to protect counterfeits from being questioned and exposed. Looking at you, Christians.
They are the origin point of the kind of thinking that says "American kids aren't eating enough vegetables. How do we fix this? Let's define tomato sauce as a vegetable! Now they're getting enough." (This isn't a hypothetical, it was an actual act of congress.) It's shameless lawyerism, which is just legalistic judaism.
To a jew, there is no underlying Reality, shy and eager to be known. There is only phenomena within minds. Counterfeits are just as valuable as - or even moe valuable than - the genuine article.
All dogma is a jewish way of thinking, a method to protect counterfeits from being questioned and exposed. Looking at you, Christians.
I wish this article went further into specifics. It's briefly complaining about quantum field theory but referencing Schrodinger and Heisenberg, neither of which were jews? Or did I miss something?
I'm not particularly adept at it but I appreciate math because it has no bullshit factor. Either the math works or it doesn't. I understand what it's talking about regarding dogmatic science but I find it strange that it's attacking physics. Physics is probably the one field of science most innoculated from dogmatic science because of the math requirements. You can't just handwave bullshit "models" and massage your statistics like epidemiologists do. Or say, the entire field of psychology. At the end of the day the work of quantum physics seems to build a unifying model of understanding, and to be able to do that with spooky bullshit absent a unified mathematic model would be impossible. So if the math works then the math works.
A good example, I think, of what the article is talking about is string theory, but it didn't exist when the article was written. The original description of elctron orbits has been proven false. While (((Bohr)))'s nuclear model wasn't correct, it's still used to introduce the concept because it's "workable enough" to help students get familiar with valence electron theory. Electrons do not orbit, they exist in fuzzy clouds of indefinable probability that defy measurement (thus we get the uncertainty principle). Which seems to be what the author is referring to with his complaints about Schrodinger's electron model existing in superposition as "dancing around the atom".
Unfortunately the article has one really big elephant in the room and it's that it was written seven years before a bunch of those dogmatic jews split the atom while the Aryan physicists in Germany failed to do so. And some of those physicists who did so were former German citizen jews.
I'm not particularly adept at it but I appreciate math because it has no bullshit factor. Either the math works or it doesn't. I understand what it's talking about regarding dogmatic science but I find it strange that it's attacking physics. Physics is probably the one field of science most innoculated from dogmatic science because of the math requirements. You can't just handwave bullshit "models" and massage your statistics like epidemiologists do. Or say, the entire field of psychology. At the end of the day the work of quantum physics seems to build a unifying model of understanding, and to be able to do that with spooky bullshit absent a unified mathematic model would be impossible. So if the math works then the math works.
A good example, I think, of what the article is talking about is string theory, but it didn't exist when the article was written. The original description of elctron orbits has been proven false. While (((Bohr)))'s nuclear model wasn't correct, it's still used to introduce the concept because it's "workable enough" to help students get familiar with valence electron theory. Electrons do not orbit, they exist in fuzzy clouds of indefinable probability that defy measurement (thus we get the uncertainty principle). Which seems to be what the author is referring to with his complaints about Schrodinger's electron model existing in superposition as "dancing around the atom".
Unfortunately the article has one really big elephant in the room and it's that it was written seven years before a bunch of those dogmatic jews split the atom while the Aryan physicists in Germany failed to do so. And some of those physicists who did so were former German citizen jews.
> You can't just handwave bullshit "models" and massage your statistics like epidemiologists do.
Ackshually that is what a lot of physicists do. String theory has been a hot bed of bullshit for a while. There is still no evidence of dark matter despite billions of funding looking for it. The particle accelerators only get results by crunching petabytes of data. (((Einstein))) Stole his work from Whites. Splitting the atom is an engineering problem: uranium enrichment is a massive undertaking.
Ackshually that is what a lot of physicists do. String theory has been a hot bed of bullshit for a while. There is still no evidence of dark matter despite billions of funding looking for it. The particle accelerators only get results by crunching petabytes of data. (((Einstein))) Stole his work from Whites. Splitting the atom is an engineering problem: uranium enrichment is a massive undertaking.
Yes and I mentioned string theory. The thing is, string theory isn't taken seriously by most physicists specifically because of the spooky magic they had to do with the math to reconcile their unified theory.
String theory isn't "discredited" because you can't really prove it wrong, it lingers around as something to ponder, but that's about it. *Technically* the math behind string theory plays out, it's just kind of games they played to make it so.
String theory isn't "discredited" because you can't really prove it wrong, it lingers around as something to ponder, but that's about it. *Technically* the math behind string theory plays out, it's just kind of games they played to make it so.
Electron probability isn't indefinable, they just exist as an entire bell curve of probability at once. Physical observation causes probability scope collapse into particle positions. Waves LARP as particles.
Right but that's why I don't understand the article. Now it was written in 1938 and all this shit was cutting edge science. I know that classical physicists weren't happy with quantum physics because the root of quantum physics is "everything you thought you knew was wrong". We don't know why on atomic scales most laws of physics break down. We just know they do and guys like Fermi, Rutherford, Pauli, Lorentz, Casimir, de Broglie, etc. were writing the rules from scratch.
Maybe the author of this article was one of those people. Deutsche Physik, which is what this writer sounds like he supports, was frankly a mistake and the reason all the atomic bomb creators ended up in America. Quantum physics was new and not well understood but nearly a hundred years later and it's still stood up, which means the detractors had to be wrong.
Well if the math works, the math works. And unfortunately nobody else has a better explanation.
Maybe the author of this article was one of those people. Deutsche Physik, which is what this writer sounds like he supports, was frankly a mistake and the reason all the atomic bomb creators ended up in America. Quantum physics was new and not well understood but nearly a hundred years later and it's still stood up, which means the detractors had to be wrong.
Well if the math works, the math works. And unfortunately nobody else has a better explanation.
Agreed. Although at this level I don't know if some of the ideas describe reality or merely satisfy equations from someone's math notes. "Dark matter" is a good example of this. Before COVID I thought science was self-correcting, now, even if a lot of high-level physics is wrong, I'm not sure we will ever find out.
Toast message