The part where they didn't follow it up with a study between wealthy niggers with present fathers versus the rest of niggers tells me that it's just a blame game and somebody needs to put a bullet in that phd's head
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
18 comments:
6
1 year ago
6 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+6Score on mirror
)
2 children
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
6
1 year ago
6 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+6Score on mirror
)
2 children
Or by doing that copout its the only way he can get the data published?
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
1 year ago
2 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+2Score on mirror
)
You are probably right, because research shows time and time again that brain atrophy, especially the amygdala, is caused by extreme neglect at a very young age, not from peers in later years. I can't remember the study off the top of my head, but it involved bringing children into a room with a stranger, and seeing how they reacted when their guardian left the room. Abused or neglected children either didnt react at all, or were constantly sporadic whether their guardian was in the room or not, indicating a malfunction of their fear complex. Brain atrophy is pretty rare outside of congenital or genetic defects while in gestation as well, since our minds are constantly reforming connections that we injure from accidents and or traumatic events, so we never really "lose" gray matter the way they are trying to claim. If it was really caused by "racism", the amygdala would light up like a Christmas tree from fear, not atrophy like in the case of neglect or abuse, which would indicate that they have something bigger to fear than a meager racial insult.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
1 year ago
1 point
(+0
/
-0
/
+1Score on mirror
)
1 child
he could have gotten a degree in something useful or studied something important, he chose to waste his time on niggers
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
1 year ago
1 point
(+0
/
-0
/
+1Score on mirror
)
I agree wholeheartedly. The problem is that a lot of helpful research gets put under the psychology umbrella, like our understanding of mental illness and how it affects us at a young age, which if medical intervention was done correctly without all the jewish cuckery, could actually have better outcomes and help us keep the actual crazies off the street. Sadly the field is lost, and what worries me is with how much the government is using "mental illnesses" as disabilities. With how relaxed the DSM-5 is on treatment (you can be marked as having severe depression after a close loved one dies, and it is almost impossible to remove it from your records, especially for your children), and if they keep following this trend, it could be an easy way to push down good people while letting actual crazies like trannies run free.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
1 year ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
When factoring in these things isn't it still a nature vs nurture issue and as a whole they are generally inferior regardless?
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Then perform the tests on infant black kids, kike cowards. Prove it or leave it in the dirt where it belongs.
Jews have more brain cells that result in evil behaviors or something.
Source: I just made it up, but it checks out.
Source: I just made it up, but it checks out.
> Our research provides substantial evidence of the effects structural racism can have on a child’s developing brain
When I was around 1, I could already walk and talk. When I was 3 I did Math because I liked it. When I talked with some nearby old woman, I was in the mood to do math and she said "let's not do math" because she was illiterate and I basically humiliated her.
And they are saying that uuuh "racism" made niggers dumb as fuck before they even came in touch with any human or watched talmudvision? It is genetic. Genetic means racial. It's that simple. It's not the culture around dogs that make them unable to speak. It's their nature. The same with niggers. Exactly the same case.
These researchers are dumb as fuck. And I mean it, literally in the pursuit of anti-intellectualism. It means they use their cognitive capabilities to conjure stupidity. Well guess what, if it's about bringing misinformation and bullshit into existence, every child with some fantasy can conjure it up too. I literally made up a person with a unique name and it confused my parents (when I was around 3-4).
When I was around 1, I could already walk and talk. When I was 3 I did Math because I liked it. When I talked with some nearby old woman, I was in the mood to do math and she said "let's not do math" because she was illiterate and I basically humiliated her.
And they are saying that uuuh "racism" made niggers dumb as fuck before they even came in touch with any human or watched talmudvision? It is genetic. Genetic means racial. It's that simple. It's not the culture around dogs that make them unable to speak. It's their nature. The same with niggers. Exactly the same case.
These researchers are dumb as fuck. And I mean it, literally in the pursuit of anti-intellectualism. It means they use their cognitive capabilities to conjure stupidity. Well guess what, if it's about bringing misinformation and bullshit into existence, every child with some fantasy can conjure it up too. I literally made up a person with a unique name and it confused my parents (when I was around 3-4).
Be careful. People will use studies like this as proof of racism, and if you don't look at how the actual written conclusions are justified, you can't call out this nonsense.
"Look, see? Harvard did a scientific study and the experts proved that structural racism is real and causes these problems! It doesn't follow from any of the data they collected, but they wrote it right there in the conclusion, so that's what the study says!"
I've even seen shit like "However, these findings contradict the consensus from other academics, so there must be something wrong with our data and the consensus is still right." Then some redditor will cite that paper that's filled with data disproving their point and just point at the conclusion to say "See? The scientists concluded using science that my narrative is right! It's SCIENCE!"
"Look, see? Harvard did a scientific study and the experts proved that structural racism is real and causes these problems! It doesn't follow from any of the data they collected, but they wrote it right there in the conclusion, so that's what the study says!"
I've even seen shit like "However, these findings contradict the consensus from other academics, so there must be something wrong with our data and the consensus is still right." Then some redditor will cite that paper that's filled with data disproving their point and just point at the conclusion to say "See? The scientists concluded using science that my narrative is right! It's SCIENCE!"
They're specifically *not allowed* to conclude that it's innate genetic factors. "Science!"
Toast message