New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Hello everyone,

Many of you probably know that I am a content creator that creates a lot of anti-Jew content (articles, songs, videos, podcasts, etc).

Because of this, I have been permabanned from places like YouTube and Reddit (and even 4chan because /pol didn't like the Catholic-flavor of my anti-Jew content). And all my songs have been banned from the major music apps.

And I have also been shandowbanned on the big social media apps: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, amongst others.

I now use alternative video channels: Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, SpiritusTV. And alternative social media: Gab, Telegram, Discord, and this place, and have people that like my content at each of these places (I thank all of you who support me!).

In the past week or so, some of you have presented other places to post my content. Both https://honkfm.com/ and https://www.suscipedomine.com/ were suggested as places where I can post my anti-Jew content.

Does anyone else have any other ideas of places that will be receptive to my anti-Jew content?

Thanks!
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PeterHann13 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Our Father’s church is the white man
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Sure. And what Church(es) did the White man predominantly belong to prior to the 16th century?
PeterHann13 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
There were many churches larger than the Church of Rome at different points prior to the 16th century: Antioch, Jerusalem, Syria, and Alexandria, for example; all of which the church of Rome propagandizes as branches of their own during those times, when they clearly weren’t. It doesn’t matter which “church” our people belong to at any given moment during time, most of us are sheep born into a system and ignorant to that system’s flaws until we are shocked back into reality…. Which is what happened with Wycliffe and Luther when they read the Bible themselves and had to translate it for the people to see and discuss it; setting off an unstoppable chain of events because many of the Catholic church’s practices had no standing or tradition derived from the Bible. Luther himself did not want to break apart the Catholic Church, he wanted the church to most importantly keep all its people but reform itself into a Biblical church, rather than one based upon the “tradition of the elders”; exactly what Jesus spoke against with the Pharisees.
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>There were many churches larger than the Church of Rome at different points prior to the 16th century:

The Eastern Orthodoxy is the only other acceptable answer. Which still to this day maintains many strong similarities with the Catholic Church. But protestants only ever criticize one, how interesting...

>Which is what happened with Wycliffe and Luther when they read the Bible themselves and had to translate it for the people to see and discuss it

Yeah, leaving entire books out of your translations containing things you disagree with might tend to skew your perceptions a bit.

<because many of the Catholic church’s practices had no standing or tradition derived from the Bible.

Never been proven, not a once in the last 500 years. Every tradition and practice (at least, until the 20th century) had a very longstanding and Scripturally grounded basis. *Sola Scriptura* is an objectively false theology. I get it though, I really do. You said it yourself, "most of us are sheep born into a system and ignorant of its flaws". You've been misled your whole life by people who had a vested interest in doing so, and the power of propaganda is strong. The state of literally any branch of protestantism today (or its even worse offspring, "non-denominationalism") is the ultimate proof in the pudding that the reformation was false from the start. Because the Catholic Church, with its *incredibly* long list of flaws is still *miles* ahead of the best that protestantism has to offer. "You shall know them by their fruits" and all that. If Luther could have seen what the result of his reformation would be, I *guarantee* you that he would have never even done it.

>he wanted the church to most importantly keep all its people but reform itself into a Biblical church

And yet, a vast majority of the protestant churches couldn't be further from the Bible. Female 'ministers' is the *least* amount of proof of this.
PeterHann13 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Lmao…

> Never been proven, not a once in the last 500 years.Every tradition and practice (at least, until the 20th century) had a very longstanding and Scripturally grounded basis.

——————————————————————

>Where is praying with prayer beads (rosary) found in the Bible? A babbling prayer that is repetitive in nature and takes use of saying phrases in specific number counts…..

-It’s not. It’s an ancient pagan practice found even in religions like Hindu and Buddhism.

-Does the Bible speak against this? Yes actually from Jesus himself in Matthew 6:7, Matthew 6:7 says, "And in praying, use not vain repetitions, as the pagans do, for they think they will be heard because of their many words".


>How about praying to the Saints? Because somehow the saints will hear your prayers in heaven and have a better “swing” with God to get your message across?

-Nope, praying to anyone but Our Father or Jesus (Our Father in the flesh) is not found in the Bible!

-Does the Bible speak against this? Yes! In 1 Timothy 2:5 it says “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.”

-If that wasn’t clear enough Jesus also says in John 14:6 “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

-Also in Revelation 19:10, an Angel appears before John, and the Angel literally says “do not worship/pray to me”… “Then I bowed down at the angel’s feet to worship him, but he said to me, “Do not worship me! I am a servant like you and your brothers and sisters who have the message of Jesus. Worship God, because the message about Jesus is the spirit that gives all prophecy.”

^so no praying to angels

-In Acts 10:25-26, “When Peter entered, Cornelius met him, fell at his feet, and worshiped him. But Peter helped him up, saying, “Stand up. I too am only a human.””

^ no praying to saints

-In 2 Chronicles 33:15 “And he took away the strange gods, and the idol out of the house of the LORD, and all the altars that he had built in the mount of the house of the LORD, and in Jerusalem, and cast them out of the city.”

^There are many many passages like this, where they take away graven images and idols of strange gods or dead people out of the church


>How about praying to Mary, “the Queen of Heaven?” Well, I would point you to verses above, but there are a few verses about this too.

-In Exodus 20:4-5 You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God

^So nothing in Heaven or Earth shall ye pray to, except GOD

-In Jeremiah 7:18 “The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the Queen of Heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.”

-In Jeremiah 14 also…. These references to the “Queen of Heaven” come from the fertility goddess worshipped by the Babylonians starting with the wife of Nimrod and continuing down through history by pagans. Her temples contained “holy” prostitutes and other grievous acts.

-In Romans 1:25 “Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and SERVED THE CREATURE more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.”

-Do you know who prays to dead people, even going to the extreme trying to raise them from the dead through necromancy and séances? Jews.


>What about the yarmulke the pope, cardinals, and bishops wear? Or the fancy fish hat of Dagon they were during ceremony?

-None of these hats are found in the Bible

-In fact the Bible says in the contrary, “Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head” -1 Corinthians 11:4.

-You know who always covers their head? Jews.


>What about during Catholic service when communion is held, and the bread and wine is brought out. The people get to eat the bread, but what about the wine? Why is that only preserved for the priest?

-In the Bible, Jesus specifically gives us the Lord’s Supper as a practice to remember him and gives EVERYONE the cup to drink from, “Then He took a cup, gave thanks, and gave it to them, and they all drank from it.” Mark 14:23

-Also in Luke 22:20, “And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which will be shed for you.’“

^Jesus didn’t reserve the new covenant for himself like the priest, now did he?


>What about the selling of “indulgences” practiced by the Catholic Church from the 11th century which led to much controversy in the reformation, and from which was promised that buying an indulgence in the name of a dead loved one, could buy them time out of Purgatory?

-Not found in the Bible. In fact, Jesus (or God himself) is the only mediator between God and man.

-But, for the existence of Purgatory, as you are Catholic you could argue that in 2nd Maccabees (12:39-46), Judas Maccabeus prays for his fallen comrades who had died in battle… but this is A.) not a reference to Purgatory, just a man’s strong emotions for his friends in the hopes they are saved and B.) The reason he’s praying for them is because they died while wearing amulets dedicated to pagan idols… so not quite the best reference


>Who is the head of the Catholic Church? The pope right?

-Wrong. In Colossians 1:18, “Jesus is the head of the body, the church” Yet, many Catholics fall all over the Pope, some even stupid enough to pray to him (not real Catholics anyway), and go on pilgrimages to see such a man.

>As for ‘Sola Scriptura’

-In Psalms 138:2, David says that God has risen his word above his name with its truths, “I will … praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name.”

-In 2 Timothy 3:16, “Every scripture inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness:”

-In 2 Peter 1:20-21, “knowing this first, that no prophecy of scripture is of private interpretation. For no prophecy ever came by the will of man” … yet the Catholic Church finds their doctrine in: Council of Trent, Vatican I + II, their many Catechisms, and the decrees of Popes (which are said to have Papal Infallibility in the Catholic dogma, although this dogma is very selectively used to prove statements but “doesn’t always apply”? Who’s the judge?

>What about the ‘Sacred Heart’ imagery? Where is this found?

-Not in the Bible, but is found in ancient Babylonian and Egyptian religions relating to Osiris being reborn divine by his mother Isis, and was seen carrying a heart-shaped fruit. Also see the Roman pagan “Bulla” necklace for young boys, and the red necklace of Vishnu.


>What about performing the “sign of the cross”? Seems benign and symbolism of Jesus, right?

-In Jewish circles this actually is called the Kabbalistic cross and is practiced during ritual ceremonial magick, black magick, and Freemasonry as well.


>Confession?

-While I do see the argument that this is a useful tool to understand your herd and make sure they are following the correct path, it is also a false doctrine with no biblical basis and encourages falsehoods such as: “the priest is your mediator to God,” “the priest has authority over you to God,” “the way to forgive your sins is by use of prayers to Mary or the saints (Hail Mary),” etc.


>I could go on and on, because the Catholic Church is literally filled with man-made rituals and customs; But in the end, I leave you with 2 verses:

There is a way that appears to be right, but in the end it leads to death. -Proverbs 14:12

 
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. -2 Timothy 4:3-4
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
>"And in praying, use not vain repetitions, as the pagans do, for they think they will be heard because of their many words".

Speaking directly to the kikes of the time, and their numerous 'prayers'.

>How about praying to the Saints? Because somehow the saints will hear your prayers in heaven and have a better “swing” with God to get your message across?...so no prayers to saints

\>Revelation 5:8

\>And when He had opened the book, the four living creatures and the four and twenty ancients fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps and golden vials full of odors, which are the prayers of the saints

What did John mean by this?

>How about praying to Mary, “the Queen of Heaven?” Well, I would point you to verses above, but there are a few verses about this too.

>In Exodus 20:4-5

Not the Bible.

>Jeremiah 7:18

Not the Bible.

>In Jeremiah 14

Not the Bible. You claim to despise jews so much yet most of your justification comes from their 'scriptures'.

>In Romans 1:25 “Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and SERVED THE CREATURE more than the Creator

Yep, lot of people do that nowadays, with the worship of modernity and consumerism. Don't see what that's got to do with anything though.

>None of these hats are found in the Bible

Yeah I could do without the kike hats too. But surely a *hat* isn't worth throwing 1.5 millennia of history out the window...

>What about during Catholic service when communion is held, and the bread and wine is brought out. The people get to eat the bread, but what about the wine? Why is that only preserved for the priest?

I consume the wine every week, don't know what you're talking about. It's standard Catholic practice to have both (some parishes still don't have it because of """covid""" or some other gay reason, but its still policy). Which you would know if you actually *looked* into things instead of just regurgitating everything you've always been programmed with. Wrong yet again.

>What about the selling of “indulgences” practiced by the Catholic Church from the 11th century which led to much controversy

Yeah it was wrong, but its not done anymore so its a nonissue

>But, for the existence of Purgatory, as you are Catholic you could argue that in 2nd Maccabees

Not the Bible. I'll do you one better, and give you a citation from the *Bible*. 1 Corinthians 3:15, "If any man's work burn, he should suffer loss. But he himself will be saved, as if though fire.

>Who is the head of the Catholic Church? The pope right?

No, he's just the #2. Not the current antipope though, he's a jewish globalist plant. The vatican is sure in a bad way, but I too would love to go see it someday, preferably after its cleansed. Great men should always be admired, in the worldly sense of the word.

>and the decrees of Popes (which are said to have Papal Infallibility in the Catholic dogma, although this dogma is very selectively used to prove statements but “doesn’t always apply”?

The "papal infallibility" thing has only been invoked twice in the *entire history* of the Catholic Church. Once to specifically delineate Mary's Immaculate Conception, and I forget what the other one was. Contrary to popular protestant belief, popes running their mouth about their personal opinions (like the current antipope, for example) *doesn't translate to religious doctrine*.

> What about the ‘Sacred Heart’ imagery? Where is this found? Not in the Bible, but is found in ancient Babylonian and Egyptian religions relating to Osiris being reborn divine by his mother Isis, and was seen carrying a heart-shaped fruit. Also see the Roman pagan “Bulla” necklace for young boys, and the red necklace of Vishnu. What about performing the “sign of the cross”? Seems benign and symbolism of Jesus, right? In Jewish circles this actually is called the Kabbalistic cross and is practiced during ritual ceremonial magick, black magick, and Freemasonry as well.

Oh come on man, you don't think this is just grasping at straws just the *least* little bit? Most protestants put up a *much* better argument than this.

>it is also a false doctrine with no biblical basis

Takes 5 seconds to type it into Google https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/a-biblical-case-for-confession. Did the Apostles sent out by Jesus have the 'authority' to act over people in His name?

>because the Catholic Church is literally filled with man-made rituals and customs

Yeah, that's the point. But it all has at least *one* basis, even if a thin one, in Scripture. Because, as John 21:25 says, "But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written".

>For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables

*Yeah*, that's exactly what's happened. Many people have been falsely instructed into turning *away* from the history and tradition of the Church of our ancestors in favor of living a modernistic life of "doing whatever makes you feel good". Because they can't handle the discipline, or the tradition. Its taken the Catholic Church 1,900 years to basically fall. It took the mainline Protestant churches less than 500 years to *completely* fall. The proof is in the pudding there as to who was more theologically sound.
Toast message