New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Hello everyone,

Many of you probably know that I am a content creator that creates a lot of anti-Jew content (articles, songs, videos, podcasts, etc).

Because of this, I have been permabanned from places like YouTube and Reddit (and even 4chan because /pol didn't like the Catholic-flavor of my anti-Jew content). And all my songs have been banned from the major music apps.

And I have also been shandowbanned on the big social media apps: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, amongst others.

I now use alternative video channels: Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, SpiritusTV. And alternative social media: Gab, Telegram, Discord, and this place, and have people that like my content at each of these places (I thank all of you who support me!).

In the past week or so, some of you have presented other places to post my content. Both https://honkfm.com/ and https://www.suscipedomine.com/ were suggested as places where I can post my anti-Jew content.

Does anyone else have any other ideas of places that will be receptive to my anti-Jew content?

Thanks!
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
>"And in praying, use not vain repetitions, as the pagans do, for they think they will be heard because of their many words".

Speaking directly to the kikes of the time, and their numerous 'prayers'.

>How about praying to the Saints? Because somehow the saints will hear your prayers in heaven and have a better “swing” with God to get your message across?...so no prayers to saints

\>Revelation 5:8

\>And when He had opened the book, the four living creatures and the four and twenty ancients fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps and golden vials full of odors, which are the prayers of the saints

What did John mean by this?

>How about praying to Mary, “the Queen of Heaven?” Well, I would point you to verses above, but there are a few verses about this too.

>In Exodus 20:4-5

Not the Bible.

>Jeremiah 7:18

Not the Bible.

>In Jeremiah 14

Not the Bible. You claim to despise jews so much yet most of your justification comes from their 'scriptures'.

>In Romans 1:25 “Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and SERVED THE CREATURE more than the Creator

Yep, lot of people do that nowadays, with the worship of modernity and consumerism. Don't see what that's got to do with anything though.

>None of these hats are found in the Bible

Yeah I could do without the kike hats too. But surely a *hat* isn't worth throwing 1.5 millennia of history out the window...

>What about during Catholic service when communion is held, and the bread and wine is brought out. The people get to eat the bread, but what about the wine? Why is that only preserved for the priest?

I consume the wine every week, don't know what you're talking about. It's standard Catholic practice to have both (some parishes still don't have it because of """covid""" or some other gay reason, but its still policy). Which you would know if you actually *looked* into things instead of just regurgitating everything you've always been programmed with. Wrong yet again.

>What about the selling of “indulgences” practiced by the Catholic Church from the 11th century which led to much controversy

Yeah it was wrong, but its not done anymore so its a nonissue

>But, for the existence of Purgatory, as you are Catholic you could argue that in 2nd Maccabees

Not the Bible. I'll do you one better, and give you a citation from the *Bible*. 1 Corinthians 3:15, "If any man's work burn, he should suffer loss. But he himself will be saved, as if though fire.

>Who is the head of the Catholic Church? The pope right?

No, he's just the #2. Not the current antipope though, he's a jewish globalist plant. The vatican is sure in a bad way, but I too would love to go see it someday, preferably after its cleansed. Great men should always be admired, in the worldly sense of the word.

>and the decrees of Popes (which are said to have Papal Infallibility in the Catholic dogma, although this dogma is very selectively used to prove statements but “doesn’t always apply”?

The "papal infallibility" thing has only been invoked twice in the *entire history* of the Catholic Church. Once to specifically delineate Mary's Immaculate Conception, and I forget what the other one was. Contrary to popular protestant belief, popes running their mouth about their personal opinions (like the current antipope, for example) *doesn't translate to religious doctrine*.

> What about the ‘Sacred Heart’ imagery? Where is this found? Not in the Bible, but is found in ancient Babylonian and Egyptian religions relating to Osiris being reborn divine by his mother Isis, and was seen carrying a heart-shaped fruit. Also see the Roman pagan “Bulla” necklace for young boys, and the red necklace of Vishnu. What about performing the “sign of the cross”? Seems benign and symbolism of Jesus, right? In Jewish circles this actually is called the Kabbalistic cross and is practiced during ritual ceremonial magick, black magick, and Freemasonry as well.

Oh come on man, you don't think this is just grasping at straws just the *least* little bit? Most protestants put up a *much* better argument than this.

>it is also a false doctrine with no biblical basis

Takes 5 seconds to type it into Google https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/a-biblical-case-for-confession. Did the Apostles sent out by Jesus have the 'authority' to act over people in His name?

>because the Catholic Church is literally filled with man-made rituals and customs

Yeah, that's the point. But it all has at least *one* basis, even if a thin one, in Scripture. Because, as John 21:25 says, "But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written".

>For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables

*Yeah*, that's exactly what's happened. Many people have been falsely instructed into turning *away* from the history and tradition of the Church of our ancestors in favor of living a modernistic life of "doing whatever makes you feel good". Because they can't handle the discipline, or the tradition. Its taken the Catholic Church 1,900 years to basically fall. It took the mainline Protestant churches less than 500 years to *completely* fall. The proof is in the pudding there as to who was more theologically sound.
Toast message