New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Hello everyone,

Many of you probably know that I am a content creator that creates a lot of anti-Jew content (articles, songs, videos, podcasts, etc).

Because of this, I have been permabanned from places like YouTube and Reddit (and even 4chan because /pol didn't like the Catholic-flavor of my anti-Jew content). And all my songs have been banned from the major music apps.

And I have also been shandowbanned on the big social media apps: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, amongst others.

I now use alternative video channels: Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, SpiritusTV. And alternative social media: Gab, Telegram, Discord, and this place, and have people that like my content at each of these places (I thank all of you who support me!).

In the past week or so, some of you have presented other places to post my content. Both https://honkfm.com/ and https://www.suscipedomine.com/ were suggested as places where I can post my anti-Jew content.

Does anyone else have any other ideas of places that will be receptive to my anti-Jew content?

Thanks!
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PeterHann13 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
This is a strawman and false dichotomy
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Lol. So what Church(es) existed from ~33AD until the 16th century?
PeterHann13 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Our Father’s church is the white man
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Sure. And what Church(es) did the White man predominantly belong to prior to the 16th century?
PeterHann13 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
There were many churches larger than the Church of Rome at different points prior to the 16th century: Antioch, Jerusalem, Syria, and Alexandria, for example; all of which the church of Rome propagandizes as branches of their own during those times, when they clearly weren’t. It doesn’t matter which “church” our people belong to at any given moment during time, most of us are sheep born into a system and ignorant to that system’s flaws until we are shocked back into reality…. Which is what happened with Wycliffe and Luther when they read the Bible themselves and had to translate it for the people to see and discuss it; setting off an unstoppable chain of events because many of the Catholic church’s practices had no standing or tradition derived from the Bible. Luther himself did not want to break apart the Catholic Church, he wanted the church to most importantly keep all its people but reform itself into a Biblical church, rather than one based upon the “tradition of the elders”; exactly what Jesus spoke against with the Pharisees.
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>There were many churches larger than the Church of Rome at different points prior to the 16th century:

The Eastern Orthodoxy is the only other acceptable answer. Which still to this day maintains many strong similarities with the Catholic Church. But protestants only ever criticize one, how interesting...

>Which is what happened with Wycliffe and Luther when they read the Bible themselves and had to translate it for the people to see and discuss it

Yeah, leaving entire books out of your translations containing things you disagree with might tend to skew your perceptions a bit.

<because many of the Catholic church’s practices had no standing or tradition derived from the Bible.

Never been proven, not a once in the last 500 years. Every tradition and practice (at least, until the 20th century) had a very longstanding and Scripturally grounded basis. *Sola Scriptura* is an objectively false theology. I get it though, I really do. You said it yourself, "most of us are sheep born into a system and ignorant of its flaws". You've been misled your whole life by people who had a vested interest in doing so, and the power of propaganda is strong. The state of literally any branch of protestantism today (or its even worse offspring, "non-denominationalism") is the ultimate proof in the pudding that the reformation was false from the start. Because the Catholic Church, with its *incredibly* long list of flaws is still *miles* ahead of the best that protestantism has to offer. "You shall know them by their fruits" and all that. If Luther could have seen what the result of his reformation would be, I *guarantee* you that he would have never even done it.

>he wanted the church to most importantly keep all its people but reform itself into a Biblical church

And yet, a vast majority of the protestant churches couldn't be further from the Bible. Female 'ministers' is the *least* amount of proof of this.
BlueDrache on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Seems pretty valid to me.
PeterHann13 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Just because the Methodists and Unitarians have gone to hell, it doesn’t make the Catholic Church any less of a traitor to our people


Just put your blindfold and earmuffs back on and pray to false idols
BlueDrache on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Whatever, rabbi.
PeterHann13 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Every that makes the Catholic Church “Catholic” is not found in the Bible.
PeterHann13 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Your bishops literally wear yarmulkes
Toast message