Luther didn't have access to the information and understanding we have today. He actually started out pro-jew until he found out about the Talmud. His era also wasn't nearly as jewed as we are today.
Luther was ultimately a Catholic - the early protestant reformers essentially saw themselves as steering the ship of the Church back on course rather than constructing an entirely new ship from scratch. This is evident in how various Catholic teachings carry over to those denominations, including universalism: jews can't be cursed, or have any other special fate - they are simply future converts who will surely turn to Jesus any day now.
There is increasing evidence of the jews being impostors, and not just from a Biblical angle. The jews insist they are the literal blood descendants of the twelve tribes, but then various evidence emerges indicating that [they actually have Canaanite DNA](https://archive.is/oLK5q) (not the totally separate DNA they ought to have from the Israelites' origins in the far-off land of Ur). In order to uphold their "true Israelite" LARP, they jump to the conclusion that the Israelites must have actually originated in Canaan all along, and the whole Genesis/Exodus account is fictional.
Looked at the article you linked to, and this passage is very interesting
>This is important because, as mentioned, researchers have already mapped the DNA of ancient Canaanites, showing that they had a strong ancestral connection to modern-day Jewish and Arab populations.
as is this
>it would support something that experts have strongly suspected for a while, that in fact the ancient Hebrews descended from the Canaanites.
which is of course complete baloney, since the Hebrews kept conclusive records (which unfortunately were destroyed when Jerusalem was burned) about who was related to whom, and they most certainly were not related to the Canaanites (outside of a few unfortunate instances of interbreeding).
The most complete one single book that a newbie should read is, by far, [David Duke's Jewish Supremacism](https://archive.org/details/JewishSupremacism_203).
He goes through a lot of different topics, so it's the best book to read first. Luther's book is good only for those who are interested in religion.
The hierarchy that Jesus establish cannot fail. His church is invincible and no one, not Luther, the jews, the Vatican 2 devils, or satan himself, can destroy it.
They cannot destroy it, but Satan is a master of deception and he can certainly trick people into thinking it is dead, which is what I think will happen before things start to get really ugly.
Not the Catholic one, it actually has an interesting means of self-policing that makes it more resistant to subversion and also easier to un-subvert itself. First of all, the prohibition of priestly marriage counteracts nepotism (which is what jews use to infest and maintain control over any structure they seek to absorb) and secondly the priesthood recruits from any able bodied young man. While the second factor enabled the jews to easily *enter in* to the hierarchy, they cant exactly pull the ladder up with them, because to do so would be to expose themselves as foreign agents. Meaning if enough jewpilled individuals wanted to simply take back control of the institution, all they would need to do is flood the seminaries and establish clandestine support networks amongst one another as they rose through the ranks. And the first factor ensures that the jews cannot easily line up replacements for themselves from outside the institution, they must recruit exclusively from within, meaning their pool of truly loyal dupes is very small.
**The Father of The Christian Protestant Reformation Didn't Like Jews & Exiled Jews. Martin Luther Wrote A Book Called ON THE JEWS AND THEIR LIES. Let's Read It and Discuss** https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/17rlw21QRk/good-morning--many-zionist-chris/c
>There is no other explanation for this than the one cited earlier from Moses, namely, that God has struck them with "madness and blindness and confusion of mind." So we are even at fault in not avenging all this innocent blood of our Lord and of the Christians which they shed for three hundred years after the destruction of Jerusalem, and the blood of the children they have shed since then (which still shines forth from their eyes and their skin ). We are at fault in not slaying them. Rather we allow them to live freely in our midst despite an their murdering,
>From all of this we Christians see for the Jews cannot see it what terrible wrath of God these people have incurred and still incur without ceasing, what a fire is gleaming and glowing there, and what they achieve who curse and detest Christ and his Christians. O dear Christians, let us take this horrible example to heart, as St. Paul says in Romans II, and fear God lest we also finally fall victim to such wrath, and even worse! Rather, as we said also earlier, let us honor his divine word and not neglect the time of grace, as Muhammad and the pope have already neglected it, becoming not much better than the Jews.
The guy said Mohammad and the Catholic Pope weren't much better than the kikes. That's quite a charge back then. The guy was talking mad shit. LOL The protestants today are pussy zionists by comparison.
Had Luther had some humility and not started the whole reformation kerfuffle (which was most due to him *not* being jewpilled at the time and thinking literal Satanists would have interest in converting), he could have redpilled of Christendom, instead of starting a sect that almost immediately got co-opted by jews.