You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
DJT4MoreYears on scored.co
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
How is this even illegal?
The entire reason to punish pedos was because it hurt the children. So now he's not hurting any children so let's punish him anyway. How retarded. These pigs need prison, not this guy. Is he sick, sure..but at least he's supplying his addiction with fake porn and not hurting anyone.
That's like a law that says, No Smoking, because tobacco is bad so someone starts vaping instead ..following the law ...but then he's arrested anyhow for vaping. LOL
An Australian painter was hauled off to prison for "producing child porn", because he painted a nude of his petite adult wife. It was neither "child" nor "porn", but they convicted him anyways, because of her physique.
We can both agree what side of the line that's on, which is government tyranny.
AI-generated CP is in a dark grey part of the line, but where exactly you draw it depends on whether you value children more than freedom.
My line on pedophilia is pedophilia. I don't care what art they're making or not making, and whether or not they've touched children, they should be executed. We can test for pedophilia. There's no need to use art products as a proxy for a test.
I agree, child porn is illegal. AI is not illegal. You're blindly accepting non-involved children creation (AI) as child porn. how do you come up with that nonsense? Oh yeah, the gubmint said so..so you blindly just capitulate to gubmint authority. Got it.
The entire reason to punish pedos was because it hurt the children. So now he's not hurting any children so let's punish him anyway. How retarded. These pigs need prison, not this guy. Is he sick, sure..but at least he's supplying his addiction with fake porn and not hurting anyone.
That's like a law that says, No Smoking, because tobacco is bad so someone starts vaping instead ..following the law ...but then he's arrested anyhow for vaping. LOL
A child is real. AI is fake. How stupid are you?
An Australian painter was hauled off to prison for "producing child porn", because he painted a nude of his petite adult wife. It was neither "child" nor "porn", but they convicted him anyways, because of her physique.
We can both agree what side of the line that's on, which is government tyranny.
AI-generated CP is in a dark grey part of the line, but where exactly you draw it depends on whether you value children more than freedom.
My line on pedophilia is pedophilia. I don't care what art they're making or not making, and whether or not they've touched children, they should be executed. We can test for pedophilia. There's no need to use art products as a proxy for a test.