You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)
>all I'm saying is a person who's never seen photography isn't going to suddenly paint a monochrome picture with the colors inverted and then never use that technique again.
# What fucking colors are inverted, you baby-raping piece of shit?
# It's dark brown smudges on a lighter-brown piece of linen. THAT'S NOT A COLOR INVERSION, YOU LOW-IQ CUNT.
Yeah you *might* have a fucking point if the entire visage of alleged-Jesus on the cloth popped to life in all the "proper" colors in a photo negative, but guess what, that's not the fucking real world. That's your faggoty schizo make-believe world. The shroud is beige linen and reddish muddy smudges constituting the image of the body. The photo negative is dark linen with bluish-white smudges instead. Literally EVERY color painted on that cloth would pop to life, because that's how negatives work.
Do you think only 'certain' colors show up as a contrast when subject to a photo negative? Are you genuinely *that* clueless?
# What fucking colors are inverted, you baby-raping piece of shit?
# It's dark brown smudges on a lighter-brown piece of linen. THAT'S NOT A COLOR INVERSION, YOU LOW-IQ CUNT.
Yeah you *might* have a fucking point if the entire visage of alleged-Jesus on the cloth popped to life in all the "proper" colors in a photo negative, but guess what, that's not the fucking real world. That's your faggoty schizo make-believe world. The shroud is beige linen and reddish muddy smudges constituting the image of the body. The photo negative is dark linen with bluish-white smudges instead. Literally EVERY color painted on that cloth would pop to life, because that's how negatives work.
Do you think only 'certain' colors show up as a contrast when subject to a photo negative? Are you genuinely *that* clueless?