Consume Product

Said the heretic atheist.

You're next in line after the kikes.

Burn in hell for eternity scum.

Because it goes something like this:

"How did that image get there?"

"Well we analyzed it and found it was likely painted on."

"I DON'T BELIEVE YOU".

It's been analyzed multiple times in multiple ways and everybody comes to the same conclusion, that it likely was created sometime in the 14th century, which coincidentally is right when it was "found". The Church itself declared it a forgery at the time.

There's only two "legitimate ways" for that image to get on there, if we rule out forgery:

1) Putrefaction from decay/skin oils soaked into the shroud.

2) Some divine something somehow someway burned the image in.

Except Jesus was only dead for three days. Even in Judea three days the body isn't going to "leak" that much and even if it did, the backside of the shroud would be very nasty. This also doesn't account for the hair being perfectly 'framed' to the face. His hair would've been laying back pooled around the back of the head.

Essentially the "the shroud is real" crowd has to rely solely on divinity, which means by definition there's no evidence for that either, nor could they provide such evidence by virtue of it simply being a divine impression.

And I'm gonna point out that the odds of a 2,000 year old piece of linen surviving intact like that is astronomically low. Functionally *nothing* linen of the Romans that survived. Almost none of their armor did, nor the Legio standards, or anything of that sort, and much of that would've been far newer than the Shroud of Turin, since Imperial citizens were still around hundreds of years after that point.

Christians barely existed for a span of 250 years after the Crucifixion. They almost certainly were not carefully keeping relics in museum-like preservation... much less hidden away like that for 1,300 years in total secrecy.

... nor can you Biblically claim that the shroud was found in the undisturbed tomb since a key part of the resurrection story is obviously that the Romans went into the tomb when they found it open, which lends even further credence to the idea that anything left in that tomb would've been removed. This wasn't King Tut's hidden burial chamber.

Last but not least, if the meme is claiming 'proof of divinity', the shroud at best simply proves He was dead.

>There's a million-dollar reward if you can recreate it

Is that true? Wouldn't it be as simple as wrapping a dead guy in a similar fabric for a couple of days?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xAVZp9tW5FU&pp=ygUic2hyb3VkIG9mIHR1cmluIDNkIGltYWdlIG9mIGplc3VzIA%3D%3D

Yet the Bible describes him as unremarkable.

I think most of these holy relics are hoaxes and scams.

I sport a toothbrush mustache now. https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/17txfG99oW/vlad-the-impaler-gets-toothbrush/c