New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
23
posted 1 year ago by rattleS on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +23Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
The problem is that "free speech" is a mutilated and castrated concept.

To the left and the cuckservatives "free speech" means allowing criticizing communists, shouting "fire" in a theater, insult and smear public figures, have corporations and banks de-person dissidents, and pornography, oh and nigger-faggot-kike propaganda.

I want to hear the lamentations of kvetching jews. I want to hear them spew their depravity. And I want people to say niggers, faggots, kikes. I want people to be able to openly name the jew and spread information about them. I am fine with having ALL of it, because ultimately it will skyrocket noticing.

And noticing will lead to a general opposition to jews, which will lead to their removal (one way or another). With them goes all the hard leftist crap, their indoctrination, their propaganda, their faggotry, their niggers, their trannies.

I don't want individual people to be ostracized for saying something. The point of free speech is to NOT do that. I would go so far as to protect them by the government as to be able to say things that are dissident. If someone gets fired for saying certain things, he should get legal leverage against his former employer.

But that is why they do not REALLY want free speech. Cuckpublicans just want to be able to criticize the hard neo-Marxist faggot-tranny garbage. But even they don't want to talk about the nigger or the jew.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
Personally I think blasphemy,pornography, and jew lies should all be banned because they *are not* speech. Speech is something intended to communicate an idea, not corrupt or deceive.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Sure, but only once the jew has been sufficiently noticed and dealt with. Anything less than having the ability to name the jew is not "free speech."

I mean it's not worth bothering with it unless it encompasses that.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Blasphemy is definitely speech, because it communicates an idea. You cannot believe in free speech and be against blasphemy.

I don't want pornography banned, but I do agree that pornography is not speech. Its goal is to elicit a physical reaction and provide entertainment, and it's not the communication of an idea.


HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
You're talking about how having free speech today in our situation would help us; and I agree. I definitely promote having free speech for strategic reasons.

But in abstract, the concept that any member of a society can spread and push ideas that are poisonous to that society and he should be left free to do so is suicidal.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Of course. Pushing degeneracy and pornography is not "free speech", it's just cultural subversion with malintent.
Toast message