You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
Conspirologist on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
I'm saying that if this is true, Asian mother won't spoil the IQ. I have no Idea why high IQ White women would marry a low IQ nigger, according to you.
1 year ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)2 children
because that's the end result of such lies "the father's IQ does not factor into the child, only the mother!" thus retarded women who read such nonsense get the impression their partners IQ doesn't matter and think of themselves as geniuses (spoiler: they're almost as dumb as the niggers they fuck)
as for "smart" asians, that's a myth, the only smart asians are the japanese
east asians probably have an IQ equal to Whites but considering how drone-like their society is, i doubt they're actually intelligent and simply good at copying stuff and obeying orders
after all, asians excel at re-innovation while Whites excel AT innovations
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Really only the Japs are worth a fuck and even then the mongoloid Yayoi genetics come out at times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Junko_Furuta
Why you worry about low IQ women? They will fuck anybody anyway. For me it's a funny article. High IQ women will not marry a low IQ nigger. Women in show biz fuck niggers because are kiked degenerates. Also, being talented is not correlated to high IQ.
It's not IQ. It's instincts. Trad wife has instincts, that's why she is trad. Sluts have degenerate instincts, that's why they are sluts.
I knew two girls in high school. They both high IQ and graduated with max score and were admitted to university asap. One was a slut, the other one was normal. If you talk to them, you can't tell the difference.
Women are more average than men, on average. Far fewer women are "truly one of a kind" than men.
Women are highly replaceable as individuals, but irreplaceable as societal breeding capacity. Men are often irreplaceable individuals, but highly replaceable as societal breeding capacity. There's a balance of yin and yang here.
the problem with the latter is that in Wars the weak men replace the strong men and women opt for the single mom/widow option so the kids will have no dads which means most of their influence is going to come from females--which spells doom for the future of the generation (weak sons and "loose" daughters are quite a recipe for shitlibism)
even on fucking (((gab))) you can still find "tradwives" justifying single motherhood saying that in war it was a common practice
the thing is, the father used to have a brother or a father or an uncle that would replace him as the guardian of the family (and sometimes even provider) but that was back when families lived in tightnit communities where people actually CARED for their neighbors & kinsmen
nowadays? we have no village, we have no families, only atomized "family units"
as for "smart" asians, that's a myth, the only smart asians are the japanese
east asians probably have an IQ equal to Whites but considering how drone-like their society is, i doubt they're actually intelligent and simply good at copying stuff and obeying orders
after all, asians excel at re-innovation while Whites excel AT innovations
but the rule is, if the eyes are wide, the skin is fair, and the earwax is wet
that's a Yamato
if the eyes are chinky, the skin is yellow and the earwax dry
then that's a gook
being talent is akin to being a prostitue (as it were in Rome)
but frankly the myth of "high IQ" women for me does not exist
the high IQ women are the ones who actually have no worldy desires and live on their farm with their husbands & children
the dumb women, are the ones chasing career and status without one wink about continuing the bloodline.
I knew two girls in high school. They both high IQ and graduated with max score and were admitted to university asap. One was a slut, the other one was normal. If you talk to them, you can't tell the difference.
Women are highly replaceable as individuals, but irreplaceable as societal breeding capacity. Men are often irreplaceable individuals, but highly replaceable as societal breeding capacity. There's a balance of yin and yang here.
even on fucking (((gab))) you can still find "tradwives" justifying single motherhood saying that in war it was a common practice
the thing is, the father used to have a brother or a father or an uncle that would replace him as the guardian of the family (and sometimes even provider) but that was back when families lived in tightnit communities where people actually CARED for their neighbors & kinsmen
nowadays? we have no village, we have no families, only atomized "family units"
At least according to the article. If you've ever met a goblin half breed, you'd know it's bullshit