New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Women are more average than men, on average. Far fewer women are "truly one of a kind" than men.

Women are highly replaceable as individuals, but irreplaceable as societal breeding capacity. Men are often irreplaceable individuals, but highly replaceable as societal breeding capacity. There's a balance of yin and yang here.
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
the problem with the latter is that in Wars the weak men replace the strong men and women opt for the single mom/widow option so the kids will have no dads which means most of their influence is going to come from females--which spells doom for the future of the generation (weak sons and "loose" daughters are quite a recipe for shitlibism)

even on fucking (((gab))) you can still find "tradwives" justifying single motherhood saying that in war it was a common practice

the thing is, the father used to have a brother or a father or an uncle that would replace him as the guardian of the family (and sometimes even provider) but that was back when families lived in tightnit communities where people actually CARED for their neighbors & kinsmen

nowadays? we have no village, we have no families, only atomized "family units"
Toast message