Consume Product

The blackmail theory with Epstein is really not convincing. As if we have all those totally honest, virtuous politicians, and they all just happen to slip up and end up having a little pedo incident and being caught on video. Oy vey, now they really got 'em! Just a little mistake was all it took!!

No. I do not think it's much relevant anyway. Epstein was just one of multiple "services" the jews did to other jews and the shabbos goyim.

There were various traitors who willingly became zionists in exchange for money, power and services like that. They became friends with the jews, their dedication was heavily rewarded. There wasn't a big conflict of interests either, they may have actually believed that serving the jews does good for everybody. Although that was rather a cope, and it's not like they needed someone who spearheaded zionism - it was only important that they raised their hand for the votes correctly. And in the media, which the jews also controlled and still do, they made sure to paint israel and jews as positively or neutral as possible, or rather not at all, so that people talking about jews come across as alien, as if "nobody talks about jews." It made most people blind to the jewish problem. They owned 96% of the US media, and barely anyone knew. So there was no reason for animosity towards the jews, and no reason to listen to it from the population - it just came from the fringe radicals, who sure are just "hateful" for no reason.

Through this process they captured most of politicians. They didn't pose the question "hey, wanna betray your people for money?" It was more of a process of grooming. And as of other work places like the media, you just followed the orders from your superiors.

And Epstein was just a service to a fraction of them. If you were big buddies with the jews and became powerful and useful to them, you were allowed to fuck children with impunity as a reward. They taped it on video, because even then the jews couldn't resist extracting more advantages for themselves. The fact that the blackmail option got exposed is a problem to them - exposing it jeopardizes their oh-so good relation with the shabbos goyim who are already in their pockets "normally" through things like AIPAC. I bet they had to pay a lot of assurances to their pet servants that it will never get out, and if it does, they will give them save haven in israel or so.

They didn't have to pull off the Epstein operation, meaning the extortion part, but oh well, they are jews, and that's their nature. So why not combine slavery, treason, pedophilia, prostitution also with a little blackmail, "just in case"? Under ideal circumstances nobody ever had to know about it, and it would have remained an unused, unknown asset. Thinking about this... what other operations exist that are unknown assets like that? That went better than the Epstein operation that blew off?

I do not think the Epstein thing can have a major impact IF people do not realize the most important part of it - more important than the fact that there are various traitors in charge who are israel first - the fact that the jews approved it, let it happen, supported it, possibly wanted the blackmail on top of it, and intended to use it "just in case" AGAINST you, FOR themselves - and that on a collective level. It wasn't a singular jew who did it, it must have been wide-spread - even Netanyahu sure knew about it. Even if you leave out the extortion - it was a jewish operation that got wide-spread approval, but was kept secret to make it functional. Sure there were hundreds of jews involved who gave their stamp of approval though, and those who knew about it but opposed it were probably just afraid that it can backfire on the jews eventually - not moral issues, like perhaps we shouldn't have state sponsored pedophilia to reward traitorous shabbos goyim.

If you want to understand the jew, you have to think like one. Think purely in terms of utility, where morals only matter for optics (you just want to look as good as possible, because the people LOVE virtues). The difference is, I think in terms of utility too, and you sure know my goals, but my optics are probably terrible. Which I think is fine, I do not need to be perceived as "good." I reject the understanding of people about good and evil anyway.