New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
9
deleted
posted 1 year ago by [deleted] (+9 / -0 )
deleted
Account deactivated by its owner
You must log in or sign up to comment
13 comments:
deleted 1 year ago 8 points (+8 / -0 ) 2 children
Account purged by its owner
5
Elvis
1 year ago 5 points (+5 / -0 ) 1 child
It may be time to move finally move the consumeproduct.win user base here. Not to mention it would also resolve the issue of us having lost contact with the domain owner.
Permalink Reply
None
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+3 / -0 ) 1 child
4
Elvis
1 year ago 4 points (+4 / -0 ) 2 children
Yes, of ConsumeProduct's .win domain. Meaning when it expires, the site will no longer be accessible.
 
Therefore the options are:
 
* Move to Arete, fully under my control
 
* Instruct users to start accessing the community via scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct effectively becoming just another "sub" of Scored
Permalink Reply
None
deleted 1 year ago 2 points (+2 / -0 ) 1 child
3
Elvis
1 year ago 3 points (+3 / -0 )
No. The few original communities, ours included, have individual domains owned by one of the moderators. The issue with ours however is that it's owned by a former subreddit mod who presumably has no interest in the .win site.
 
We used to be in contact in an Element chat, but the 200acres custom server we used mysteriously went offline. We don't have any other contacts. Seeing that it's been almost a year since then and that individual has made no attempt at reaching out on .win or even made an account, I can safely assume he has abandoned us.
Permalink Reply
None
0
TallestSkil
1 year ago 0 points (+1 / -1 )
Oh… I’ve always done that. It’s easier than trying to manage a dozen logins across separate URLs…
Permalink Reply
None
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+3 / -0 )
2
EJGeneric
1 year ago 2 points (+2 / -0 )
New user trending on Scored™ is IP2always, Memes, ChonglandTV, Crypto and WhiteBeauty apparently?
 
Recommended is ConsumeProduct, Kotaku in Action2, Conspiracies, NoNewNormal, and Funny.
 
Apparently, the 3rd channel down is just called 'Granite_Pill'.
Permalink Reply
None
2
sparrow
1 year ago 2 points (+3 / -1 ) 1 child
they're just going the pragmatic route
 
it's not necessarily a bad strategy but is risky, they could start to get more traffic and then be tempted to push out freer spech to maintain popularity
 
or they could be trying to softly discourage it initially in order to grow and then there would be padding to absorb allowing it more
 
basically it's questions about normie management
Permalink Reply
None
0
TallestSkil
1 year ago 0 points (+1 / -1 ) 2 children
>it’s pragmatic to ban truth from view solely to improve SEO ratings
 
Traitor.
Permalink Reply
None
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+3 / -0 ) 1 child
0
TallestSkil
1 year ago 0 points (+1 / -1 ) 1 child
Feel free to commit suicide, paid shill. Why would anyone believe a word you say?
Permalink Reply
None
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+1 / -0 ) 1 child
0
TallestSkil
1 year ago 0 points (+1 / -1 ) 1 child
[citation needed]
Permalink Reply
None
Continue thread...
0
sparrow
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
well, I think you understand the dilemma
 
"Unfiltered" free speech may drive away users and create an echo chamber. "Censored" but mostly open speech site may allow users to come who might agree with more filtered views, and then start to believe in unfiltered views.
 
there may be a place for either or both approaches. like arete doing whatever while scored allows less of whatever. or a site that filters commie or pro abortion posts as another alternative.
 
for example the "free speech" discussions site had a problem with people posting fecal pornography. I imagine that would drive away tons of regular people if it was "uncensored" posted everywhere on a site that was trying to cater to normies.
 
u/josephgoebbels
Permalink Reply
None
0
TallestSkil
1 year ago 0 points (+1 / -1 )
>"Censored" but mostly open speech site may allow users to come who might agree with more filtered views, and then start to believe in unfiltered views.
 
And I’m all for that. I don’t believe in “unfiltered” anything, because that’s how you get tens of thousands of bots to control the narrative. The censorship that must be applied is to anything known to not be true.
Permalink Reply
None
Toast message