Hitler Was Right!

I do remember. When voat started going down more often than a pre-teen asian hooker, I looked for other places.
Usually, the front pages were the usual reddit bullshit, then I noticed that posts started to get good. I think you were also in ConsumeProduct, but can't recall exactly. Your posts on voat are the ones I remember the most, and we interacted on many occasion. I got much more engaged, got booted from a few subs. Good times.
 
Then the fucks started to take things down, and then sold it. I think you (or someone else) called them out on what they were going to do (or at least I saw), and sure the fuck enough; that was that.
 
And, you're exactly right. Calling someone a niggerfaggot, while a first measure of free speech, isn't enough. You start promoting a White identity and Nationalist ideal--that's the true measure. The jew won't allow that.

I used to live there, I still have some old currency.

If you wish to have a formal debate we should agree on what debate is. For me, debate requires a clearly defined binary, which you have not provided. It is not ad hominem for me to explain that statements are too ambiguous to refute. (Nor have you tried to give me a timestamp where your link gets any better or more to the point.)
 
Example of debate: On 16 Sep 1919 Hitler wrote that our purpose "must unshakably be the removal of the Jews altogether". I can join a binary on this by saying that Hitler was wrong because there was no formal judgment by which every Jewish man, woman and child was found guilty and subject to "removal", and because the later acts by which this removal was attempted did not constitute such a judgment. Today Germany has one of the top ten Jewish populations by country, so it appears Germans at large also disagreed with Hitler. Now you could join this debate by showing what evils the Jews did before 1919 and what competent body heard these charges and merited his judgment. If Hitler was right in 1919, the 100k+ German Jews today, without exception, still call unshakably for removal for the crimes 100 years ago. Maybe one of us can convince the other Hitler was right or wrong on this point, or maybe we will agree to disagree having refined what we know about him and about racism in general. But any of those would be preferable to declining to debate, such as by calling it a "prove it loop" (an exercise I have always found stimulating no matter how concretized the interlocutor).