You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
6
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
2 days ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)3 children
Yids like Cahn are probably the leading reason why the Pentecostal type of Christianity that does nothing but perform a function for yids also happens to be the only type of Christianity that seems to still be growing, rapidly spreading at the very least across Latin America (where it even infests criminal organizations) and Africa.
Any belief system that argues:
1. That the return of Jesus is conditional upon the State of Israel's continued existence (observe that, if this never happens, exactly as the yids believe, you will be left supporting the State of Israel *forever* in the hope that it will still prove true at some later time)
2. That yids will one day convert *en bloc* to Christianity (observe that this effectively neutralizes 'anti-Semitism': we can't do anything to the yids because their mass conversion is necessary for prophecy. Since this will never happen, you're also perpetually identifying the yids as friendly.)
3. Genesis 12:3 necessitates unconditional support for the yids (unless you want to be cursed by God, and since no one wants that, again, you're stuck perpetually identifying the yids as friendly).
Can best be explained functionalistically as a belief system simply created by the yids. Look at who stands to benefit the most from the above beliefs. Clearly yids: each of these three core beliefs works to build a permanent support base for both the State of Israel and the yids more generally.
And if they greatest stand to benefit from it, it is not difficult to infer that they might be the cause of its proliferation. Then you see the likes of Johnathan Cahn pushing Judeo-Christianity, the unusual, seemingly pro-Christian Jew - see, 'anti-Semitic' Christians, not all Jews are bad! - and the case for causation becomes stronger.
Observe also that this form of Christianity also tends to downplay Jesus in favour of Moses, Aaron, and David in particular. Why might that be? Functionalism again: it moves people away from the Jesus they reject to the prophets they accept.
That is part of why Latin American criminal organizations are so drawn to it: the seemingly effete, peacenik, proto-'Dude Weed, bong on!' version of Jesus that prevails in the contemporary world doesn't resonate as well with machismo, violence, etc., whereas these more warrior, kingly, etc. figures do.
Ask yourself how criminal organizations could possibly have the Truth about God?
God is the greatest deceiver of all, even than Satan: He will always outwit those who think that they can outwit Him, deceive those who deserve to be deceived, and He will always send signs to those who are good.
Just as you wouldn't ask a Pakistani drug dealer about Islam, nor an Indian drug dealer about Hinduism, nor would you ask a Brazilian cartel member about Christianity. Yet the answers that he will give you will undoubtedly be the same as those that Johnathan Cahn will give you, like those in the three points above. Yes, Johnathan Cahn's theology is the same as that of literal cartel members. That is how the perceptive and good person knows that Cahn does not know the Truth. His theology is indifferentiable from that of common criminals. That is a sign to those who are perceptive and good. It does not occur to the evil and stupid: 'Wait, are my religious views really the same as those of common criminals!?'
If your theology is also that of those brown idiots chopping each other's heads off over drug debts and gang affiliations, you have been out-deceived by the greatest deceiver of all, and that is only so because both you and them deserve it. That is the trick that He has played on many of those who are evil: misled them all across the world into embracing religious falsehoods of all kinds so that the very scum themselves become walking warning signs marking falsehoods.
Despise their ideals all you want but you can't deny the effectiveness of their methods. Cartel spic vatos and favela macacos are closer to the spirit of Crusaders or Oprichniks than any judeochristian fag pastor wearing rainbow vestments telling us to tolerate everything will ever be.
Any belief system that argues:
1. That the return of Jesus is conditional upon the State of Israel's continued existence (observe that, if this never happens, exactly as the yids believe, you will be left supporting the State of Israel *forever* in the hope that it will still prove true at some later time)
2. That yids will one day convert *en bloc* to Christianity (observe that this effectively neutralizes 'anti-Semitism': we can't do anything to the yids because their mass conversion is necessary for prophecy. Since this will never happen, you're also perpetually identifying the yids as friendly.)
3. Genesis 12:3 necessitates unconditional support for the yids (unless you want to be cursed by God, and since no one wants that, again, you're stuck perpetually identifying the yids as friendly).
Can best be explained functionalistically as a belief system simply created by the yids. Look at who stands to benefit the most from the above beliefs. Clearly yids: each of these three core beliefs works to build a permanent support base for both the State of Israel and the yids more generally.
And if they greatest stand to benefit from it, it is not difficult to infer that they might be the cause of its proliferation. Then you see the likes of Johnathan Cahn pushing Judeo-Christianity, the unusual, seemingly pro-Christian Jew - see, 'anti-Semitic' Christians, not all Jews are bad! - and the case for causation becomes stronger.
Observe also that this form of Christianity also tends to downplay Jesus in favour of Moses, Aaron, and David in particular. Why might that be? Functionalism again: it moves people away from the Jesus they reject to the prophets they accept.
That is part of why Latin American criminal organizations are so drawn to it: the seemingly effete, peacenik, proto-'Dude Weed, bong on!' version of Jesus that prevails in the contemporary world doesn't resonate as well with machismo, violence, etc., whereas these more warrior, kingly, etc. figures do.
Ask yourself how criminal organizations could possibly have the Truth about God?
God is the greatest deceiver of all, even than Satan: He will always outwit those who think that they can outwit Him, deceive those who deserve to be deceived, and He will always send signs to those who are good.
Just as you wouldn't ask a Pakistani drug dealer about Islam, nor an Indian drug dealer about Hinduism, nor would you ask a Brazilian cartel member about Christianity. Yet the answers that he will give you will undoubtedly be the same as those that Johnathan Cahn will give you, like those in the three points above. Yes, Johnathan Cahn's theology is the same as that of literal cartel members. That is how the perceptive and good person knows that Cahn does not know the Truth. His theology is indifferentiable from that of common criminals. That is a sign to those who are perceptive and good. It does not occur to the evil and stupid: 'Wait, are my religious views really the same as those of common criminals!?'
If your theology is also that of those brown idiots chopping each other's heads off over drug debts and gang affiliations, you have been out-deceived by the greatest deceiver of all, and that is only so because both you and them deserve it. That is the trick that He has played on many of those who are evil: misled them all across the world into embracing religious falsehoods of all kinds so that the very scum themselves become walking warning signs marking falsehoods.