>Well, for one thing, he didn’t do the holocaust. He could have and he should have, but he didn’t because he was a Jew-loving faggot. Secondly, he refused to kill Anglos, despite also having the ability to kill them in vast quantities. Instead of killing Jews and Anglos, like an intelligent person would have, Hitler just killed millions of Russians and Germans, which benefited Britain and the USA. He was one of the biggest dipshits in history, honestly.
- comment from https://www.unz.com/article/whats-wrong-with-hitler
Lol
If I were in power, I would be nowhere near like Hitler. I would seek the extermination of all non-Whites, I would seek 100% ethnic homogeneity, and finally solve the jewish problem once and for all. And I would enact the most malevolent methods imaginable to achieve that. In fact, I wouldn't care about the concept of good and evil at all, or morality that is.
Hitler was just a great leader, who despite all his revelations, was still too merciful and naive. But to know this is hindsight, so I don't blame him. If Hitler would have won, his ways could have worked out, maybe he could have reformed the jews. But that's hindsight + vast knowledge via internet to know that that's unlikely.
For example the social media jews, the Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street ones, the NGO nigger-importing jews, the anti-justice judges, the corrupt DAs, porn jews, and all the shabbos goyim traitors. I'd take my time with Netanyahu and squeeze out of him the truth about Charlie Kirk - out of curiosity, but also to garner support for my crusade if successful. Maybe even more, like 9/11, the USS Liberty.
He underestimated the influence, and malice, of world Jewry.