You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
17
bobbacringo on scored.co
1 day ago17 points(+0/-0/+17Score on mirror)2 children
The media chose this story to go viral. The purpose of it is to promote post natal murder of children. The female support is artificially driven like all things in this world today. Women see the attention that the woman gets, THEY WILL START KILLING THEIR CHILDREN.
We know this to be true because of how man women suddenly have trans or gay children. They will do anything for attention. There are several books that cover female hysteria. One of my favorites is "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds". I'm going to guess that the ancient stoic philosophers also have writings of the same thing.
Several other users have already posted anecdotes throughout our history about how women will do insane things for attention. If you've ever been around women, none of this should surprise you. When I was younger, women started cutting their wrists for attention. If that didn't work they'd claim to be a lesbian until they got knocked up somehow. Nothing has changed.
Another insidious aspect of this ordeal is to introduce the idea that women can blame murdering their children on mental illness. Women can rationalize anything to avoid accountability. Got a nigger baby? Oh she had post mortem depression (regret), so the nigger gets it. If this becomes acceptable in the public sphere, we will see entire households wiped out.
Actually a really good point that's been hiding in plain sight. I'm surprised that the notion of this whole thing being intentional to normalize child murder didn't occur to me. Fucking kikes, man.
>The media chose this story to go viral. The purpose of it is to promote post natal murder of children.
I'm not entirely sure about that. It is a "man bites dog" story - men like Chris Benoit and others (I know one personally) have tried to kill their entire families, yet none of those went viral. Why is that? The truth is - it's much more common for men to flip out and take out their families. We'll leave their motives out of it (definitely not a cheating whore as a root cause).
>The female support is artificially driven like all things in this world today.
That could be, and that would lend more to your conclusion of fomenting social support for murdering children. But the story going viral alone isn't enough - sometimes, many times, the media (social and mainstream) is just reacting to a shocking/funny/entertaining story. A story that draws eyes and ears.
*If* the support is artificial, and I highly suspect it's not *entirely* artificial, which you would too if you haven't been living under a rock the past, oh, 50 years since Roe (which is back in the limelight thanks to a good ruling from SCOTUS)... if the support is artificial, that's what led the story to become viral. Because a woman murdering her children is shocking and horrific (like the [Hart murder-suicide](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart_family_murders#) that was also viral news, though they did a service taking out all of those niggers), that draws eyeballs. But the new twist that makes it viral is that GoFundMe exists, and I think there is a lot of genuine support because *that's how far gone those bitches already are.* Pink pussy hats marched in DC when Trump was elected. Fuck, I've worked with a chick who legitimately thought DesmondIsAmazing was a good thing. These people exist without artificial support.
Your comment here goes on to kind of defeat the need for artificial support - as you say, women are fickle creatures - many are completely beholden to the whims and winds of the Zeitgeist. "Oh, it's cool to be lesbian now? Okay, I'll do that too!"
I'd say the only thing artificial about this really is the dawn of the feminism (jewish-driven movement). This is just the next logical step - men are unburdened by child birth and, consequently, less burdened by child rearing. The goal of feminism is, contrary to what the name implies, the destruction of the feminine to replace it with the masculine. Thus women unburdening themselves from children in the same way men are is the final step - men can walk away from a pregnancy anytime, fine, so can women. Even after birth.
>If this becomes acceptable in the public sphere, we will see entire households wiped out.
It won't, because of that reason right there. Not only is there resounding shame for all of the supporters, but it's a self-defeating movement to boot, like a suicide cult. It stops itself.
I wholeheartedly agree with your conclusion of Lindsay needing to die publicly. I think public executions need to come back in a big way - people need to *see* and through that *vicariously experience* the consequences of such heinous crimes.
We know this to be true because of how man women suddenly have trans or gay children. They will do anything for attention. There are several books that cover female hysteria. One of my favorites is "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds". I'm going to guess that the ancient stoic philosophers also have writings of the same thing.
Several other users have already posted anecdotes throughout our history about how women will do insane things for attention. If you've ever been around women, none of this should surprise you. When I was younger, women started cutting their wrists for attention. If that didn't work they'd claim to be a lesbian until they got knocked up somehow. Nothing has changed.
Another insidious aspect of this ordeal is to introduce the idea that women can blame murdering their children on mental illness. Women can rationalize anything to avoid accountability. Got a nigger baby? Oh she had post mortem depression (regret), so the nigger gets it. If this becomes acceptable in the public sphere, we will see entire households wiped out.
I'm not entirely sure about that. It is a "man bites dog" story - men like Chris Benoit and others (I know one personally) have tried to kill their entire families, yet none of those went viral. Why is that? The truth is - it's much more common for men to flip out and take out their families. We'll leave their motives out of it (definitely not a cheating whore as a root cause).
>The female support is artificially driven like all things in this world today.
That could be, and that would lend more to your conclusion of fomenting social support for murdering children. But the story going viral alone isn't enough - sometimes, many times, the media (social and mainstream) is just reacting to a shocking/funny/entertaining story. A story that draws eyes and ears.
*If* the support is artificial, and I highly suspect it's not *entirely* artificial, which you would too if you haven't been living under a rock the past, oh, 50 years since Roe (which is back in the limelight thanks to a good ruling from SCOTUS)... if the support is artificial, that's what led the story to become viral. Because a woman murdering her children is shocking and horrific (like the [Hart murder-suicide](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart_family_murders#) that was also viral news, though they did a service taking out all of those niggers), that draws eyeballs. But the new twist that makes it viral is that GoFundMe exists, and I think there is a lot of genuine support because *that's how far gone those bitches already are.* Pink pussy hats marched in DC when Trump was elected. Fuck, I've worked with a chick who legitimately thought DesmondIsAmazing was a good thing. These people exist without artificial support.
Your comment here goes on to kind of defeat the need for artificial support - as you say, women are fickle creatures - many are completely beholden to the whims and winds of the Zeitgeist. "Oh, it's cool to be lesbian now? Okay, I'll do that too!"
I'd say the only thing artificial about this really is the dawn of the feminism (jewish-driven movement). This is just the next logical step - men are unburdened by child birth and, consequently, less burdened by child rearing. The goal of feminism is, contrary to what the name implies, the destruction of the feminine to replace it with the masculine. Thus women unburdening themselves from children in the same way men are is the final step - men can walk away from a pregnancy anytime, fine, so can women. Even after birth.
>If this becomes acceptable in the public sphere, we will see entire households wiped out.
It won't, because of that reason right there. Not only is there resounding shame for all of the supporters, but it's a self-defeating movement to boot, like a suicide cult. It stops itself.
I wholeheartedly agree with your conclusion of Lindsay needing to die publicly. I think public executions need to come back in a big way - people need to *see* and through that *vicariously experience* the consequences of such heinous crimes.