Consume Product

That movement was actually one of the most successful, especially in terms of growth, in recent decades.

When the Indian Muslim duo, Sajid and Naveed Akram, went and ventilated some yids, something *very* strange happened: all of a sudden, a law was passed that banned both the NSN and Hizb-ut-Tahrir. The two most anti-yiddish groups in the country were all of a sudden banned based on the actions of two Indian Muslims who had absolutely no relation whatsoever to either group.

It seemed pretty obvious at the time that this law wasn't just a spontaneous reaction - governments operate far too slowly to come up with this law from scratch and pass it at the speed at which they did - but rather that the law was pre-prepared.

The fact that this law protects no group but yids was attacked from *both* sides for not being 'inclusive' enough: groups Leftward of the government complained that it didn't include Muslims, LGBT, etc. and groups Rightward of the government complained that it didn't include, for instance, various Christian groups.

Thus the Centrist course was the one perfect for the yids: too far from the Left to protect Muslims, LGBT, etc. but too far from the pseudo-Right to protect Christians. That led to this utter farce of a law, one that exists only to protect the yids and no one else, and ban the groups against them and no one else.

At that moment, the case that yids control the country became far stronger than ever before. There is no way that the law wasn't pre-prepared by their own lawyers and then pushed on the government after the Bondicaust. If it was simply the Leftist ruling party who pushed it, you can rest assured that the law would also protect Muslims and LGBT and ban 'Islamophobic' and 'heteronormative' groups as well. 'To find out who rules over you, find out who you can't criticize', and all that. If the only two political groups in the country's history that were banned were banned precisely for 'anti-semitism', the yids rule over you, not some other group.

NSN avoided moves that stagnant movements (e.g. Britain's NRP) are stuck in. For instance, NSN (like America's PF) kept women off the frontlines and out of formal membership; NRP makes them front and centre. In fact, the mainstream parties have such low membership counts (most people vote for them but aren't enthusiastic enough to be card-carrying members) and NSN grew so large that when the time came that they considered the formation of a separate political party, it seriously looked like they would have a higher membership count than the mainstream parties. It seriously had the mainstream parties worried: a 'Far-Right' group with more members than they themselves have. Disciplined, uniformed men on the march works to grow numbers: suits, ties, and politicking doesn't. You do the former first, the latter, insofar as it has to be done, comes *after* your numbers are already large enough.