You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 day ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)
While reading your disputes is funny, let's talk about the problems of Nick Fuentes.
The catboy thing - let's ignore that. It's more of an ad hominem and possibly taking things out of context. Even that he may not be fully White isn't even the problem, purity spiraling is retarded and him trolling is no evidence of anything.
The real problems are these:
- He strongly denies that jews assassinated Charlie Kirk, yet he did not hesitate to spew a lot of words praising him for days and weeks, as if they weren't ideological opponents.
- The way he does it is by bringing up the most fringe things and dismiss it entirely. He does not address reasonable theories, he never addressed what CK wrote or said about israel, he never addressed the fact that Netanyahu posted 20 min too early about it (add ~5+ minutes for composing the message too), before any media even wrote about it. Or that there was a notorious kike who acted as distraction claiming he was the shooter, and by having child porn (what a surprise) he remained suspicious enough.
- Fuentes advocates to "infiltrate" the systems over decades to bring change. The problem is that the nature of these positions of power is that you must be incompetent and depraved to begin with, and play along your entire life UNTIL you snap your finger and suddenly you reveal the basedness.
- He advocates to vote Democrats in order to send a message to Republicans to get their shit together. Fine, but 1. he fundamentally believes in the proper functioning of Democracy, 2. he is literally doing what is expected behavior within Democracy. There is nothing novel or revolutionary about it, it's just the cycle of Democrats and Republicans exchanging power forever.
- He strongly advocates against violence, while violent revolution and assassinations are the most feasible solutions. He may be biased because he likes his life as a professional, millionaire talker.
- He talks about israel, Trump, Vance and politicians critically, and some jewish billionaires, but that's the full extent of what he does.
- He REALLY goes a lot against all sorts of right-wing personalities, as if he is the manifestation of ultimate enlightenment. He wants to define what the most edgy right-wing may be, which is him. Anything that goes beyond that is just stupid and bad. So: Vote harder goy and become born by proven traitors or kikes to fill in positions of power. As such he also coined the term "low-IQ antisemites."
Let's be clear that the ultimate goal is TKD and TND. What he advocates for is... a slight improvement to the status quo at best. Just politick a little better, and everything will be fine. He lives on his millions of dollars as a cushion, so why should he ever say anything truly radical that would actually bring positive change for people? He benefits from the system as it is.
The catboy thing - let's ignore that. It's more of an ad hominem and possibly taking things out of context. Even that he may not be fully White isn't even the problem, purity spiraling is retarded and him trolling is no evidence of anything.
The real problems are these:
- He strongly denies that jews assassinated Charlie Kirk, yet he did not hesitate to spew a lot of words praising him for days and weeks, as if they weren't ideological opponents.
- The way he does it is by bringing up the most fringe things and dismiss it entirely. He does not address reasonable theories, he never addressed what CK wrote or said about israel, he never addressed the fact that Netanyahu posted 20 min too early about it (add ~5+ minutes for composing the message too), before any media even wrote about it. Or that there was a notorious kike who acted as distraction claiming he was the shooter, and by having child porn (what a surprise) he remained suspicious enough.
- Fuentes advocates to "infiltrate" the systems over decades to bring change. The problem is that the nature of these positions of power is that you must be incompetent and depraved to begin with, and play along your entire life UNTIL you snap your finger and suddenly you reveal the basedness.
- He advocates to vote Democrats in order to send a message to Republicans to get their shit together. Fine, but 1. he fundamentally believes in the proper functioning of Democracy, 2. he is literally doing what is expected behavior within Democracy. There is nothing novel or revolutionary about it, it's just the cycle of Democrats and Republicans exchanging power forever.
- He strongly advocates against violence, while violent revolution and assassinations are the most feasible solutions. He may be biased because he likes his life as a professional, millionaire talker.
- He talks about israel, Trump, Vance and politicians critically, and some jewish billionaires, but that's the full extent of what he does.
- He REALLY goes a lot against all sorts of right-wing personalities, as if he is the manifestation of ultimate enlightenment. He wants to define what the most edgy right-wing may be, which is him. Anything that goes beyond that is just stupid and bad. So: Vote harder goy and become born by proven traitors or kikes to fill in positions of power. As such he also coined the term "low-IQ antisemites."
Let's be clear that the ultimate goal is TKD and TND. What he advocates for is... a slight improvement to the status quo at best. Just politick a little better, and everything will be fine. He lives on his millions of dollars as a cushion, so why should he ever say anything truly radical that would actually bring positive change for people? He benefits from the system as it is.