2 days ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
Pretty sure he never said it was ok to deny Christ and try to build a third temple that denied the body of Jesus as the temple. It's the entire reason he made the dwarves and gave them a Semitic based language. Their quest for their homeland and lust for money almost undoes them and everyone else. Like Hitler he thought he could rehabilitate them by teaching them Christian values in his work. Sadly it didn't work even on his own grandson. Tolkien was also a Catholic when their pope flat out said they would never recognize a Jewish country because they do not recognize Christ.
Tolkien didn't have access to a ton of research that wasn't jewed. They owned the publishing houses as Roald Dahl said. They owned the newspapers and claimed 6 million victims decades before the holohoax. If he knew the shit they were doing behind closed doors or Masons or had access to the Epstein files you don't think he would have been much more critical? They told his entire generation growing up that all the stories about jews were lies and back then people had much more trust in the news and their leaders. They didn't think they would backstab them for kikes and sell out their own people. The idea was probably unthinkable to Tolkien who loved his own people so much that he wanted to create a mythology about them.
2 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
TIL about Roald Dahl. Not sure how I didn't know that, thanks for sharing. Ripped right from kikepedia:
"...they killed 22,000 civilians when they bombed Beirut. It was very much hushed up in the newspapers because they are primarily Jewish-owned. I'm certainly anti-Israeli and I've become antisemitic in as much as that you get a Jewish person in another country like England strongly supporting Zionism. I think they should see both sides. It's the same old thing: we all know about Jews and the rest of it. There aren't any non-Jewish publishers anywhere, they control the media—jolly clever thing to do"
Funnily enough the librarian I dated in college was a children's librarian and loved Roald Dahl, but she also introduced me into graphic nonfiction with Maus one Thanksgiving while visiting her brother's family in South Carolina. His daughter was adorable.
Tolkien didn't have access to a ton of research that wasn't jewed. They owned the publishing houses as Roald Dahl said. They owned the newspapers and claimed 6 million victims decades before the holohoax. If he knew the shit they were doing behind closed doors or Masons or had access to the Epstein files you don't think he would have been much more critical? They told his entire generation growing up that all the stories about jews were lies and back then people had much more trust in the news and their leaders. They didn't think they would backstab them for kikes and sell out their own people. The idea was probably unthinkable to Tolkien who loved his own people so much that he wanted to create a mythology about them.
"...they killed 22,000 civilians when they bombed Beirut. It was very much hushed up in the newspapers because they are primarily Jewish-owned. I'm certainly anti-Israeli and I've become antisemitic in as much as that you get a Jewish person in another country like England strongly supporting Zionism. I think they should see both sides. It's the same old thing: we all know about Jews and the rest of it. There aren't any non-Jewish publishers anywhere, they control the media—jolly clever thing to do"
Based