New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
44
Patriarchy vs liberal democracy (media.scored.co)
posted 9 hours ago by dudebro on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +44Score on mirror )
10 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
6
devotech2 on scored.co
6 hours ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
There should be no voting period. No female vote, no male vote, no aristocratic vote. The whole experiment has been a disaster from start to finish. Giving *anyone* a "voice" via their vote leads to demagoguery and societal destruction. It took America less than 100 years to vote itself into a civil war, and with an all white male vote at that. It doesn't work. It can't work. It will never work no matter what demographic you give the right to vote to. Even the roman republic, which can be considered quite successful in spite of its stupid system, was wracked by severe instability on a continuous basis throughout its entire existence, the fact it ever survived is more a miracle than anything else.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
6 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Letting a handful of prince-electors select the next king worked fine for near a thousand years in the first reich. Scaling the electorate up is where things start falling apart.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
devotech2 on scored.co
6 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Either that or party delegates can select the leadership of a country. Of course, no outside parties should be allowed in the first place. I find the concept of multiple parties to be incredibly fucking stupid, it just leads to political infighting.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message