New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
26
posted 9 hours ago by RealWildRanter on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +26Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PurestEvil on scored.co
8 hours ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 2 children
So when people claim that their privacy doesn't matter, let them collect whatever data they want - this is a clear example where your data is used against you.
RealWildRanter on scored.co
8 hours ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
> I GoT nOtHiNg tO HiDE!

It is an offense to retards to say these people are retarded. They've chosen that on their own. Retards at least don't control their intellect. If we ever get around this mess at the very least we will have to take their voting rights.

PS: I hate these jeets fucking up software that used to work well like autocorrect. TJD
covok48 on scored.co
4 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Women’s voting rights need to go first.
serengetidesert1973 on scored.co
4 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
>When people claim

We can't be getting hung up on "people claiming". It creates the illusion of consent. We're just reacting to things online. There is no grand social debate on immigration, or privacy, or whatever.

Nobody asked me if I want my privacy invaded. Someone welcoming mass surveillance as it's being implemented doesn't magically grant the government such a power. The government has been imposing itself on us for a long time.

This idea that some nigger looks sad in a picture, there's some mass sadness that takes root and then the government is forced, through peer pressure, to inject a 1000 niggers into your neighborhood; that idea is false.

It's literally the reverse. They inject a 1000 niggers. They then post a sad picture. Then we imagine people are feeling sad or something.
Toast message