New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
50
White girl explains why race mixing is bad (twitter.com)
posted 22 hours ago by dudebro on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +50Score on mirror )
23 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
PurestEvil on scored.co
9 hours ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yes, but your example is about Orientals. With brownoids of ANY kind, it's just a massive drop in genetic quality. Meaning your offspring will be less intelligent by default. If I'd generate children with a nigger, they'd at best be of average White IQ - I cannot compensate the sheer decrease, and no matter what I'd do, I'd have to watch my legacy consist of midwit half-niggers who start to talk at age 4.

While if I'd find a smart White woman to have children with, they'd be far above average by default. With variance it means they'd be *just* above average to possibly extremely high.

This is just simple genetics. It's a massive downside for all White people - because whatever genetics you consider positively, intermixed with a brownoid it will inevitably decrease. Then you can be happy that it didn't decrease *as much*. And intelligence will drop too, so even if you don't care about that, you will once it becomes a notable problem (that goes for all genetic traits).
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
LilyVargas on scored.co
6 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>midwit half-niggers who start to talk at age 4

I don't know what age they start talking but after noticing the pattern IRL and on social media I looked it up and researched confirmed it: nigglets have advanced gross motor skills for their age, some are even walking at 6 months old. It's scary enough when a pure White baby starts walking at 12 months because they are so "stupid" they are constantly trying to kill themselves by accident. Walking months earlier must be an absolute nightmare.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
PurestEvil on scored.co
5 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Well, in my case I could walk before I was 1.0 (never remember crawling anywhere), talk around 1.0 to 1.5, form memories around age 1.0, and did basic math around age 2.5 and knew the alphabet too. When I went to elementary school I was speed-running math tasks, most often being the first, competing with some stuttering Chinese guy.

So I'd assume the ability to walk was tied to cognitive development. But oh well, niggers are truly a different species. I bet everything else than walking occurs much later than what is normal for Whites.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
LilyVargas on scored.co
1 hour ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Walking from 10 months I think is early but within normal range, most are within a couple of weeks before/after 1st birthday. Your first words and first math are normal but memory saving (I assume that's what you mean, memory *forming* should happen before birth but those memories are only saved for months or maybe up to 5 years at best.) is remarkable, and your math was advanced in elementary achool.

I believe the early gross motor skills are inversely related to intelligence, only asain babies took their first steps after Whites. For niggers it is probably related to neglect as well as low intelligence - not being held as much etc, they have to be independent earlier for survival.

Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message