You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
7
devotech2 on scored.co
22 hours ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
I agree. However, we need sufficient organized agitation to make these things happen. People aren't going to march for no reason, moreover, if they do it will not be coherent, nobody will have the same goal, and it will inevitably be co-oped by feds to make normies feel like they did something important so that they never do anything at all (remember occupy wall st?)
We can sit around and wait for our catalyst all damned day. This leads to a form of "tailism" where we move the goalposts forward constantly waiting for the masses to have a spark of consciousness, and then we will pick up after them. This is wrong. Lead from the front. Successful ideologies are always led from the front. Were the mensheviks in Russia, the pre-hitler natsocs in germany, the KPD, etc successful? No and it's because they all wanted to tail mass-thought.
Here's an example: what do you think the average German in weimar Germany knew about political and economic issues? If the answer is "basically nothing", you're correct. And it's still the same today (evidently), so what are you going to do? Wait for everyone to become more educated? A majority of people are wilfully ignorant and they always have been, you're gonna be waiting for a damned long time. What would have happened if hitler just waited for a movement to start? Germany would be communist. It's a requirement to tell people "this is what's wrong and this is how I will stop it" and slap them across the face with reality.
What's it gonna be then? The covid lockdowns? Nope. The constant military failures and fake wars? Nope. The siphoning of tax dollars to Israel? Nope. The epstein files? Nope. Inflation? Nope. Gas prices? Nope. None of these magically sparked consciousness or revolutionary fervor. Not even combined did they do this. You have to create it on your own, and it may require some hitherto unforseen disaster, but even pure chaos will not create a movement with a brain all on its own, it requires someone to cultivate a will to act among the populace.
That person remains to be seen. And his beliefs are unknown because he does not exist yet. Will it be another Hitler or another Lenin? Well, the personality of either of these 2 individuals was enough to create something enormous. So the choice is on us, really. Do we want to win or do we want to lose?
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Yeah, it could very easily be the communists that win out in the end, even without a violent revolution like in the past, considering how many of them are getting elected as democrats. That party is always on a leftward churn, yet republicans can never move away to the right in response. I can hardly get boomer/gen X republicans to publicly denounce the acceptance of gays in our society.
We can sit around and wait for our catalyst all damned day. This leads to a form of "tailism" where we move the goalposts forward constantly waiting for the masses to have a spark of consciousness, and then we will pick up after them. This is wrong. Lead from the front. Successful ideologies are always led from the front. Were the mensheviks in Russia, the pre-hitler natsocs in germany, the KPD, etc successful? No and it's because they all wanted to tail mass-thought.
Here's an example: what do you think the average German in weimar Germany knew about political and economic issues? If the answer is "basically nothing", you're correct. And it's still the same today (evidently), so what are you going to do? Wait for everyone to become more educated? A majority of people are wilfully ignorant and they always have been, you're gonna be waiting for a damned long time. What would have happened if hitler just waited for a movement to start? Germany would be communist. It's a requirement to tell people "this is what's wrong and this is how I will stop it" and slap them across the face with reality.
What's it gonna be then? The covid lockdowns? Nope. The constant military failures and fake wars? Nope. The siphoning of tax dollars to Israel? Nope. The epstein files? Nope. Inflation? Nope. Gas prices? Nope. None of these magically sparked consciousness or revolutionary fervor. Not even combined did they do this. You have to create it on your own, and it may require some hitherto unforseen disaster, but even pure chaos will not create a movement with a brain all on its own, it requires someone to cultivate a will to act among the populace.
That person remains to be seen. And his beliefs are unknown because he does not exist yet. Will it be another Hitler or another Lenin? Well, the personality of either of these 2 individuals was enough to create something enormous. So the choice is on us, really. Do we want to win or do we want to lose?
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed