Consume Product

This is just Herbert Marcuse but even more degenerate and idiotic. The very language used reeks of it: 'toxic masculinity', 'gender policing and fragile heteronormativity', 'intersectionality', 'progress', 'utopia', personal 'boundaries'. Gets called 'buddy' (i.e. is almost certainly male) but doesn't deny carrying a 'purse' (i.e. is probably a LGBTQHIVAIDS+ male). Literal soycialist.

Remember what some groid 'academic' retard said after Austin Metcalf's murder? That 'black boys' need to have their boundaries respected, as though having your boundaries disrespected - like getting caught stealing, being told to leave a place that doesn't belong to you, etc. - gives you the right to stab someone multiple times.

Pray tell, just what are these personal boundaries? Do White boys have the right to kill groids that violate these supposed boundaries? Does a little boy adopted by faggots molesting him have the right to kill them? No, of course not. That would be racist, homophobic, and the like. Let's face it: protected 'minorities' have inviolable 'boundaries' that serve as yet another excuse for crime and deviance - as though they did not have enough excuses already - while good people have no such boundaries and so cannot use this as a defence when things go wrong for them. It's simply more Left-Wing conceptual twaddle.

Intelligent, moral people don't care about the concept of the 'proletariat'; for instance, because, as Far-Right writers correctly determined decades ago, it is simply a projection of the yiddish mind onto the goy.

Proletarian: A materialistic, egalitarian, rootless cosmopolitan who views countries, cultures, religions, etc. as false, oppressive constructs of the ruling class, who views no place as home but considers himself merely a 'global citizen', a 'citizen of the world', living wherever it is most expedient to him, who would sooner harm his own bourgeois brother than a yid.

Yid: A materialistic, egalitarian, rootless cosmopolitan who views every culture, religion, etc. - except his own - as oppressive constructs of the ruling class, who views no place as home and lives wherever it is most expedient to him, who would sooner harm the greatest of goyim than the worst of yids.

They're the same picture, goy: the only difference is biological. Marx simply took a bunch of yiddish attributes and projected them onto the goyim. 'Believe me, goy, at heart, deep inside, you are really just like us! You just need us to reveal to you your own real interests, such as that you have more in common with a Nigerian than with your own family!'

Put simply, the proletarian is simply a mentally Judaized goy. Install yiddish software on goy hardware and you get a proletarian, someone who acts in perfect accordance with the yid's ideal conception of the goy. He will never be a tribalist, an 'anti-semite', he will never be but an ideal host for the yid latched onto him.

That was one of the points of deviation between Marxists and Fascists, where the two really started to fall out with one another: Fascists simply became realists about countries, while Marxists remained constructivists about them. Fascists began to suspect that this ideology - one that wants you to kill your wealthier brother in 'class struggle' and 'class warfare' in favour of Oluwadamilola Ngubu Okpara, your fellow proletarian from Nigeria, who is supposedly somehow greater deserving of your brother's wealth - is actually just plain and simply wrong. Too bad that they didn't distance themselves from these degenerate idiots enough.