Consume Product

No.

Consider their voting habits and the answer is self evident.

Why should anyone who doesn’t build society and who has to be protected as an incubator for nine months he allowed to direct that society?

They shouldn't even be considered sentient

Let alone have any sort of political power

The recent video by Basic Logic goes into this in depth, but in short, no, because women are naturally followers, not leaders. They usually regurgitate the dominant opinion of the household or institution or culture to which they belong, and so initially, letting them vote was pointless; women would vote similarly to their husbands and fathers. But then an incentive structure developed where women could vote for the government to replace their husband, household, or community, as her breadwinner and protector. Think welfare, over-policing, DEI. And thus politicians became incentivized to create more of these dependent women voters by weakening communities, weakening families, and weakening men. Then the culture shift followed, with academia becoming infected by the same feminizing rot. If women have strong families, they just vote for whoever their family votes for, so why bother, and if they don't have strong families, they vote to destroy society. They shouldn't vote.

No. Voting, and through the process of voting the exercising of political power is a responsibility of great magnitude that a woman should not, cannot be expected to bear.

Also women constantly make really stupid decisions so there's that as well.

Why *SHOULD* they vote?

Voting is fake and gay. I legitimately don't respect anyone who does it anymore. Bring back kings and emporers.

Women will vote for wars they don't have to fight. No thank you.