I've ONLY ever heard this from spics and commies. Exclusively.
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I'm sorry my friend but I speak for literally everyone on this silly little issue. It's not normal human behavior to replace yourself with an ad jingle generator and yeet out of the conversation even if people will politely let you get away with it. Just because nobody is reading our thread does not mean you can just do whatever you want without it being weird and awkward.
> the LLM is on point
The LLM is not on point about anything. You just sat there while it spammed you with party garbage, letting it barf gay word salad all over you and supplying updates to its context engine, providing additional data to the extrapolation algorithm until it began to reorient and produce the result you wanted originally when you approached it. The productivity you think you've accomplished by explaining yourself to an AI over and over [was it even your LLM?] isn't an accomplishment I want shared. Congratulations on winning your own game, games are great, but that victory is not the same thing as "it" being "on point" and does not warrant you to involve it the conversation like it was your friend or representative. Maybe ask it to teach you to laugh at gory jokes when appropriate too instead of wigging out about it like a psycho, if it is as you socialize it to be.
> It is an extension of my thoughts.
This perfectly underscores my point. Stop prompting for a while; this is an intervention on prompting. You need to realize how gay that is before you can prompt again.
Your pretend-authority is rejected.
> Just because nobody is reading our thread does not mean you can just do whatever you want without it being weird and awkward.
Oh, but posting some faggot-gore is fine though? That was the moment you lost all respect and credibility. That means only objective arguments matter now. Anything that is your opinion is worthless.
> The LLM is not on point about anything.
Then refute anything it said instead of making vague, large-scale claims. Or do you just want me to paraphrase and simplify it for you? The level of tyranny in the US is high, and you are dumb and delusional to believe it isn't. This is the short version.
I wasn't even sure how exactly it manifests in the US, but yes, big corporations are the ones who do the censorship, the jewish banks do the debanking, and every corporation will fire you for expressing even the slightest dissidence. The government itself doesn't have to do much directly (mostly), in fact it would have to protect people against your tyrannical corporations. But it doesn't, because they are compliant with that.
Better? Why should I paraphrase this if the LLM is way more elaborate about that? And I knew this btw, but I had to look up the details. I am dealing with information about 30+ countries, the US is just ONE of them.
The rest is pointless blabla lecturing bullshit I couldn't care less about. Completely disregarded.