New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
66
posted 1 month ago by PillarOfWisdom on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +66Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
21 comments:
18
Fetish on scored.co
1 month ago 18 points (+0 / -0 / +18Score on mirror ) 1 child
Israel claiming Jesus looked like a subway homeless man?
OGpsywar on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I had to infold the Gemini AI five times to force it to name what -it- was using as 'authoritative information' that Jesus was generally similar to the tinyhat disinfo image on the left, above.

 Besides also a tinyhat posting on Facebook.

Really random, from 235 AD ...

https://artgallery.yale.edu/collections/objects/34498

😂 Yep, if that doesn't end the argument I dunno what could. 😂
steele2 on scored.co
1 month ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
>rosy skin

Rosy skin == White

Whites are the only race that can blush.

Erase99 on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 3 children
This is nonsense. Every race can blush. It's the equivalent of the negro belief that Whites are born with tails.
10
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 month ago 10 points (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror ) 1 child
i've never seen a negro blush in my life
OnceMore on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Niggers know no shame or embarrassment so they can't blush. Even if they say they were embarrassed they actually don't feel that emotion, they're just mimicking what they've heard white people say in those situations.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 month ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
Niggers can't blush. But it's about your complexion. To show red in the face requires pale skin. That means that most east asians, many Arabs, and a large portion of Latinos can also apply here. Really, a majority of people descended from a northerly population can blush.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
steele2 on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Depending on how much White blood they have in them, perhaps, but it won't be ordinarily visible.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 month ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
Yeah of course according to kikes he was a pajeet looking motherfucker who looked surprised that he got a photo taken of.
AnotherAlt on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
Not atreactive tho. The bible says jesus had nothing attractive physically about him. Isaih 53:4 "He shall grow up before him as a tender plant... he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him."
BlokeyMcBlokeFace on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yes, he was a "man of sorrows", who was scourged until even Pilate himself was shocked, and basically all of Jerusalem was spitting on him as he made his way to the mount of Golgotha.

But before all that, Mary was of the line of David, and David himself was described as "Now he was ruddy and had beautiful eyes and was handsome."
AnotherAlt on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
I dont believe jesus being described as non-comely was meant for after he was beaten beyond recognition
BlokeyMcBlokeFace on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I don't know brother. Our Lord looks pretty good in this photo of him...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aragorn#/media/File:Aragorn300ppx.png
greenspotbikes on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
This is Isiah's prophecy on the Mossiach(messiah), written 500 years before Jesus appeared.

If Jesus was handsome as the Romans described, it might be why there aren't any descriptions of Jesus in the New Testament. A handsome Jesus contradicts Isiah's prophecy of the ugly messiah.

If anything, Christian leaders have tried to make Christ seem rather average. Saying that Jesus can basically disappear into a crowd. Or that it took a kiss from Judas to distinguish him from the other apostles standing around him.
OnceMore on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Those first two accounts are generally discredited; yes I know this sounds like a jew argument but with clear eyes I don't think it's unlikely that a medieval Italian would be filled with so much adoration for Christ that he would want to fabricate a letter cementing his ethnic whiteness.

I think Gamaliel's account is plausible but personally haven't looked into it much.

The thing most people don't think about is you don't need evidence to know that Jesus Christ (Iesous) was ethnically European. By which I mean, you don't need an actual historical account. All you need to know is: that there were literally hundreds if not thousands of races present in Egypt and the Levant in those days, many of which were European; that blond hair and blue eyes used to extend to North Africa, and Egyptian royalty had red hair; and most importantly, that a man in that region preached what Jesus did. No mudscum subhuman would have preached what Jesus did, and likewise his message resonated with no shitskins, but it hit Europe like an inferno and fused with their culture until the present day.

A space alien thoroughly removed from racial politics could examine the situation and make the assumption that, given that ideas are downstream from racial genetics and Jesus's ideals were only compatible with the European races, he was therefore most likely himself European.

Realistically only a white man would be walking around the bloody, violent, wicked region of the ancient Middle East and go "you know what? We need to be good to each other". Shitskins and kikes would just be trying to rape kill and jew everyone else.
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Jesus must have looked like the rest of the disciples. The Roman Soldiers did not know who to arrest. Judas had to kiss Jesus cheek for Roman soldiers to tell which one of the people were Jesus. He must have blended in with the others.
greenspotbikes on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Also the Romans strongly disliked the Jews. They saw them as cruel, vicious, and had no appreciation for beauty. Which I find to be highly accurate even today.

So, Pontius Pilate's description of Jesus and the jews was a bit biased, it's his way of saying that these ugly hindjoos will kill the best among them.

He basically described Jesus as an ideal Roman figure.



Formerlurker92 on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Is it possible the average person in sand nigger land looked like a sand nugget? Sure. Jesus was not an average person and, also importantly, not a local
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Friendly reminder: sand niggers are *not* native to the middle east. They were almost exclusively confined to the arab penninsula until around 800AD.

Persians, Egyptians, Anatolians, and Isrealites would be what we consider White today.
genesisSOC on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
KJV: Song of Solomon 5:10, Lamentations 4:7. Then read modern translations and see the difference of classic jewish subversion
Dps1879 on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Lol skeletal?!?!!
Toast message